Class-action legal settlement against EatStreet reveals possible financial insolvency

Class-action legal settlement against EatStreet reveals possible financial insolvency

EatStreet, the Madison-based online food-ordering company, appears headed toward foreclosure or insolvency, according to court papers filed Dec. 9.

The filings show the company is no longer able to pay a $1.2 million settlement in a class-action lawsuit brought by delivery drivers, or at least EatStreet’s owners need more time to pay.

The company’s legal problems date to 2020, when Kristoffer Martin, a former EatStreet delivery driver, and two other drivers, sued in federal court over alleged wage theft.

The drivers contended that EatStreet violated the Fair Labor Standards Act and Wisconsin wage law when it “failed to reimburse delivery drivers for vehicle and mileage expenses and when it used drivers’ tips to meet minimum wage requirements.”

In an August settlement, after three daylong mediation sessions and several months of negotiations with a former magistrate judge, EatStreet agreed to pay $1.2 million, including $413,333 in attorney fees. The amount was a fraction of what the plaintiff’s attorneys were seeking, according to a court document.

People are also reading…

During those sessions, EatStreet shared financial information that persuaded the mediator that the company might not be able to pay the larger judgment sought by the plaintiffs.

Then, in a motion filed Dec. 9, EatStreet’s lawyers notified the court that the company no longer believes it will be able to honor the agreed-upon payment obligations.







Matt Howard

EatStreet CEO Matt Howard was one of the speakers at the Greater Madison Chamber of Commerce’s IceBreaker luncheon in 2015.




“Over the last three months, EatStreet’s financial circumstances have deteriorated rapidly due to multiple factors,” according to the recent filing.

EatStreet is asking for more time to negotiate another solution and promises to update the court by Feb. 13.

The company was still operating as of Friday, delivering food from 185 restaurants to customers in the Madison area.

Humble origins

Matt Howard, EatStreet’s chief operating officer, and Alex Wyler, its chief technology officer, founded the company in 2010 in a dorm at UW-Madison, and it has become one of the largest online and mobile food ordering and delivery services in the United States.

Its website shows EatStreet is in about 250 cities, connecting customers to about 15,000 restaurants.

In late 2017, Howard and Wyler were named to Forbes’ 2018 “30 Under 30” list, which recognizes high-achieving young entrepreneurs and philanthropists.

Text messages and calls to Howard and Wyler weren’t returned Thursday or Friday.

Loan default

In September, EatStreet’s main creditor said the company was in default of its loan and negotiated with the company so it could continue operating, documents show.

At the same time, in the filing, EatStreet’s owners said until October they were talking with a national entity that expressed interest in buying it or funding it, but that the deal no longer appears likely.


Ghost kitchen, grocery concepts under EatStreet ghosted employees, abruptly closing shop

Also in October, EatStreet shut down operations of HungerHub, a commercial kitchen and grocery concept it started late last year with three Madison “hubs”: Forkful Market by EatStreet on State Street, and hubs on the East and West sides.

HungerHub had to lay off a number of employees, given its continued inability to generate a profit, the documents say.

More trouble

Late last month, EatStreet learned that it had been sued by several Dane County landlords, the filings show.

According to court records, as of Dec. 8, EatStreet’s primary creditor indicated it intended to move to foreclose on EatStreet’s remaining assets, which serve as collateral for the company’s outstanding debt.

“EatStreet remains in negotiations with its lender, but given the dire financial situation at this stage, EatStreet’s lender is likely to initiate a foreclosure action (or some other insolvency proceeding) by the end of the year,” the records say.

In asking to renegotiate the settlement with the former drivers, the company also said it was anticipating a substantial, eight-figure payment from the Internal Revenue Service based on a pending application for an Employee Retention Credit.


Departed Oakwood Village CEO calls resident concerns 'disturbing'

According to federal Paycheck Protection Program data, EatStreet, based at 316 W. Washington Ave., got a $3.6 million COVID-related PPP loan from the Small Business Administration in April 2020.

As of June 2021, the loan’s status was forgiven from repayment under PPP guidelines, according to information accessible on the website of ProPublica, the investigative journalism nonprofit.

Driver’s story

“Working for them was fairly easy,” at first, said Martin, 36, the initial plaintiff, who lives in Eau Claire, and worked as a driver for EatStreet from November 2018 to November 2019.

He said early on, the company kept its word that drivers wouldn’t have to deliver outside of Eau Claire. “We had a very defined map of our delivery area, but they eventually changed that and we were forced as drivers to deliver well outside of our delivery area.”







Delivery

A delivery driver puts an order from a local restaurant into his car.




Martin said he first became suspicious of the company on Christmas Day in 2018 when he had one delivery, but it was 12 miles away in Fall Creek.

He said the way EatStreet operated then, drivers only got paid for the time it took to get to the restaurant from wherever they were, and then to the delivery location. They weren’t paid for the time it took to return from the delivery zone.

“By sending me out to Fall Creek, I was 30 minutes out, had lost effectively an hour or so, a half an hour of pay. So, for that one delivery I made $0, actually negative amounts of money.”

Over the year, Martin said, he realized the company was “stealing wages,” and with the accumulation of mileage and depreciation on his vehicle, he said his hourly wage was well below the guaranteed $10 an hour he was promised by the company. “It was even below minimum wage.”

So, in March 2020, he filed the class-action suit. “If they were doing it to me, then they were doing it to other drivers,” Martin said.

He said he couldn’t comment on the development that EatStreet can’t honor its settlement obligations now.

Last-minute push to pass bipartisan immigration deal fails, dooming yet another reform effort

Last-minute push to pass bipartisan immigration deal fails, dooming yet another reform effort

Washington — Negotiations in the Senate to forge a bipartisan compromise on U.S. immigration and border coverage unsuccessful to obtain adequate traction to go just before the conclusion of this session of Congress, dooming nonetheless a different effort and hard work to reform a process that has not been updated in decades, congressional officials common with the issue advised CBS Information.

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, an impartial who right up until very last 7 days was a Democrat, and GOP Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina had been discussing a probable offer that would have bundled the legalization of a subset of the tens of millions of unauthorized immigrants residing in the U.S., as effectively as specified steps aimed at reducing illegal crossings alongside the U.S.-Mexico border.

But Sinema and Tillis did not strike a offer that would have been in a position to secure the important 60 votes in the evenly divided Senate during the lame-duck session, a few congressional officials stated, requesting anonymity to explain the outcome of interior negotiations.

The very long-shot bid marks Congress’ most up-to-date failure to pass a regulation designed to overhaul an immigration technique it has not noticeably up to date considering that the 1990s and that Democratic and Republican lawmakers have mentioned is in desperate need of reform.

The failure to reach a deal throughout the lame-duck session also dampens prospective buyers of a bipartisan arrangement on immigration in the in the vicinity of upcoming, due to the fact Republican lawmakers will acquire management of the Household in January and have vowed not to grant “amnesty” to any team of unauthorized immigrants.

Federal Judges Senate
Sens. Kyrsten Sinema and Thom Tillis leave the Senate chamber on Feb. 25, 2020.

J. Scott Applewhite / AP


One of the congressional aides familiar with the talks reported there was not enough time for Sinema and Tillis to reach a deal prior to the conclude of the year, specifically given ongoing initiatives to pass federal government funding payments. The aide stated a framework stemming from the talks could serve as the foundation for a monthly bill in the future Congress.

In an interview with Politico last week, Sinema said she and Tillis were being performing on the “most tricky political concern of all of our professions.”

The talks among Sinema and Tillis concentrated on giving a route to lasting legal standing to “Dreamers,” or unauthorized immigrants introduced to the U.S. as small children, a longtime Democratic precedence. They also sought to deal with Republican fears about the unprecedented ranges of border arrivals recorded more than the previous calendar year.

In accordance to folks acquainted with the negotiations, the border-related merchandise floated as element of the talks integrated increasing the salaries of Border Patrol agents and bolstering their ranks, offering added resources to the Division of Homeland Stability for detention facilities and deportations and enacting further penalties for migrants who do not show up at their court docket hearings.

Other proposals integrated the establishment of processing facilities to establish whether or not migrants have credible asylum instances and an extension of the Title 42 pandemic-connected border constraints, which have authorized the U.S. to expel hundreds of hundreds of migrants on public wellbeing grounds because 2020. The plan, which blocks migrants from in search of asylum, is set to conclude on Dec. 21 because of a court ruling.

One of the explanations negotiators attained an deadlock was mainly because of a Republican demand from customers to control releases of migrants into the U.S., which includes by terminating the Flores settlement, a court docket settlement that limitations the detention of migrant youngsters, two congressional officers explained.

While the talks among Sinema and Tillis been given expressions of guidance from reasonable lawmakers and corporations, they also garnered criticism from critics on each the still left and correct. 

Immigration hardliners and some Republican lawmakers criticized the legalization proposal for Dreamers, saying the U.S. should not be granting “amnesty” to immigrants residing in the U.S. devoid of lawful permission amid history arrivals of migrants along the southern border.

Progressive advocates and lawmakers, on the other hand, denounced the border-similar proposals, together with the Title 42 extension, saying they would undermine the rights of asylum-seekers.

Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, who has earlier floated bipartisan immigration compromises, advised Reuters this week that the Sinema-Tillis talks had been “not going any place.”

For decades, Congress has remained gridlocked on immigration difficulties, with main bipartisan initiatives to modify U.S. immigration legislation faltering in 2018, 2013 and 2007. The 1st monthly bill to legalize Dreamers, for case in point, was launched about two decades back, in 2001.

Advocates for immigrants have urged Congress to legalize this populace offered the authorized challenges that threaten the existence of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, an Obama-era coverage that shields approximately 600,000 Dreamers from deportation and makes it possible for them to operate in the U.S. lawfully.

A federal judge in Texas who has earlier located DACA to be illegal is set to rule on the program’s legality at the time once more future yr.

Queensland given first glimpse of proposed new Property Law regime

Queensland given first glimpse of proposed new Property Law regime

Queenslanders have now been given their very first glimpse of Queensland’s proposed new home regulation routine with the new release of the community exposure draft of the Residence Regulation Invoice 2022.

If passed, the Invoice will repeal and replace the just about 50-yr-aged Assets Legislation Act 1974 (Qld) with a new residence law regime supposed to modernise assets law in Queensland. In unique, the Invoice aims to repeal outdated clauses in its predecessor and involve more modern language and provisions which improved reflect recent industrial techniques.

The Bill is primarily based upon 232 recommendations by the Queensland University of Know-how subsequent its assessment of the Home Legislation Act at the request of the State’s Lawyer-Normal in 2013. The Invoice is in its extremely early session phases, with the Federal government owning just done the procedure of getting submissions from the public and stakeholders to tell its closing plan positions on the Invoice.

As the Invoice will work as a total replacement of the Property Regulation Act, it involves a large array of small and big proposed adjustments to the current regime, 3 of the noteworthy adjustments proposed are:

Limitation Periods for deeds: The time limitation for an motion based mostly on a deed will be lowered from 12 several years to 6 decades.

We say: At this time, the time limitation for an motion dependent on a contract is 6 decades and based mostly on a deed is 12 many years. The United Kingdom has earlier thought of shortening the limitation period of time for deed (but has not but) and New Zealand lessened it to 6 decades in 2010. Other jurisdictions in Australia have at present retained 12-15 12 months limitation durations. There are many other explanations to use a deed as an alternative of an settlement (or vice versa), but shortening the limitation period of time will take absent a person of the major distinctions among the two and one particular of the key rewards in using a deed as opposed to an agreement.

It appears from the session draft of the Bill that the new limitation time period is meant to only use to new deeds, and is not proposed to have an impact on the limitation intervals below present deeds or versions of them.

The remaining Monthly bill will may possibly in the end glance pretty unique to the latest draft, even so the exposure draft has presented an interesting glimpse of the means in which Queensland’s assets regulation regime is most likely to modify. The home marketplace will continue to keep an eye on the Bill quite carefully as it progresses to its final variety and we will proceed to present updates about any key modifications.

Lease Assignments: It is proposed that a tenant and any guarantor of the tenant’s obligations will be released from legal responsibility below the lease subsequent an assignment by the tenant, and a subsequent assignment to a third tenant. The launch relates to any breach by the subsequent (ie. third) tenant.

We say: The proposed provision are not able to be excluded by agreement. Landlords considering a request from a tenant for the assignment of the lease to a new tenant will need to assure they are happy with the strength of the covenant kind the new tenant and any safety offered.

Seller Disclosure Statements: The Authorities intends to also contain a new statutory disclosure routine for sellers. The proposed regime was the topic of a different, before, general public consultation.

We say: Sellers of land would be required to disclose approved information and facts about the house to a possible Buyer (this sort of as fundamental searches and crucial facts), together with by issuing a Disclosure Statement and applicable Certificates. This is widespread in other States, but a broad disclosure obligation has not been imposed in Queensland for transactions other than “off-the-plan” or group title scheme revenue.

Leading Virginia Beach Personal Injury Lawyer Authors Legal Examiner’s Top Ten 2022 Civil Justice Stories

Leading Virginia Beach Personal Injury Lawyer Authors Legal Examiner’s Top Ten 2022 Civil Justice Stories

Attorney Rick Shapiro highlights this year’s top 10 civil justice scenarios.

Press Launch


Dec 15, 2022

Shapiro, Washburn & Sharp is energized to announce that Virginia Beach front personal injuries law firm Rick Shapiro has authored The Lawful Examiner nationwide news “Top rated 10 Civil Justice Stories of 2022.” Shapiro has been producing the annual prime 10 checklist just about every yr for the previous decade.

Some of the instances highlighted in this year’s edition incorporate:

  • Jury Fingers Down File-Placing $464 Million in Damages in Work Retaliation Scenario
  • Johnny Depp Statements Damages Victory in Defamation Trial In opposition to Amber Listened to
  • Jury Orders Common Motors to Pay back $102.6 Million in Damages for Neglecting Defective Motor Aspect
  • British isles Talcum Little one Powder Ovarian Cancer Litigation Proceeds Versus Johnson & Johnson

Shapiro was just lately named a Leader in the Regulation in Virginia in 2022 by Virginia Legal professionals Weekly. This honor was bestowed on only 33 lawyers, prosecutors, and judges in the full condition of Virginia. 

Shapiro and his legislation company have litigated personalized injuries instances for extra than 30 many years in each and every southeastern point out in the place, successfully negotiating personal harm insurance coverage settlements and acquiring jury awards for 1000’s of customers.

This year, the Virginia Beach private injury law agency commissioned and released a statewide examine of the most dangerous pedestrian crossing spots in Virginia. This research also contains an interactive map that exhibits exactly the place the 10 most unsafe areas are found. 

In addition to his robust dedication to advocating for wounded consumers and their families, Shapiro is also the very best-promoting writer of Taming the Telomeres, a #1 suspense thriller on Amazon. Go through an job interview of Shapiro about his novel with the Virginia Condition Bar’s publication Docket Phone at this link. He is also an American inventor with 18 U.S. patents in the discipline of folding wheel products.

About Shapiro, Washburn & Sharp

Given that 1985, the attorneys with Shapiro, Washburn & Sharp have targeted exclusively on plaintiff’s personalized injury law. In actuality, the firm’s motto is “All We Do is Damage Law.” This laser emphasis on damage regulation is a person of the causes why the agency has gained a name as 1 of the ideal personal damage law firms in Virginia. The firm’s major place of work is centered in Virginia Seaside, Virginia, with consumer assembly amenities through Hampton Roadways, exclusively Norfolk, Hampton, Portsmouth, Suffolk, and the Outer Financial institutions of North Carolina. 

Supply: Shapiro, Washburn & Sharp

Family Attorney on Steps Coparents Can Take to Make Holidays Better

Family Attorney on Steps Coparents Can Take to Make Holidays Better
  • Patrick Baghdaserians is a household regulation lawyer and dad.
  • He says setting up in advance, excellent interaction and regard are crucial during the vacations.
  • This is Baghdaserians’ story, as advised to Kelly Burch.

This as-instructed-to essay is dependent on a dialogue with Patrick Baghdaserians. It has been edited for size and clarity.

Like a lot of moms and dads, I was worn out just after Halloween. But it was not since my daughters, who are 8 and 5, ate too a great deal candy. It really is simply because holidays — even seemingly insignificant types like Halloween — are fraught for my purchasers. 

I’m a household regulation legal professional in the condition of California. More than 15 decades in apply I’ve helped navigate hundreds of divorces. At times, even situations that appear to be intricate can go smoothly if the events do the job with each other. 

But the tales that adhere out for me are the damaging ones, like the boy whose mom and dad have been in courtroom together due to the fact before he was even born. That time, they ended up fighting more than his name. Now, he is a teen and I really feel like I know him, mainly because I see his relatives so frequently. That’s not the romantic relationship you want with your family members regulation attorney. 

I’m a father, so I get it. My kids are the most critical issue in my daily life. My purchasers really feel the exact same way. But from time to time, their egos make that difficult to don’t forget. Here’s what I’ve acquired about the issues coparents can do to endorse the very best desire of their little ones in the course of the vacations. 

System in advance, way ahead 

The best thing you can do to be certain a smooth getaway year is to approach perfectly ahead. I advise my clients to explore any modifications to the custody timetable at least three to 4 months in advance of time. 

This sets a good tone for the discussion. It shows that you regard the coparent, their time, and their routine. Usually, with time on their side, dad and mom can arrive at a compromise that leaves every person delighted. 

If you are not able to you can have enough time to file a movement and have a judge weigh in. No 1 wishes to have to be in court more than Thanksgiving plans. But, holidays are essential and even judges realize that often co mothers and fathers need to have third-celebration enable. 

Converse respectfully

Future, believe about the tone of your interaction. Starting the conversation ahead of time is a great very first phase. Now, show that you are prepared to be reasonable and negotiate. 

I’m observing far more mom and dad getting divorced when their children are youthful. That usually means you can expect to be coparenting for a very long time. You want to lay a foundation of respect in your words and phrases, tone, and action. It can be the proper detail to do, and in the extensive operate, it will help you get much more of what you want. 

Be reasonable

We all have challenges we won’t be able to budge on. But in a coparenting problem, your little ones should by no means be a person of all those concerns. Successful coparenting usually takes overall flexibility and knowing. 

Be willing to aid your coparent. It is really tempting to go get your revenge and demand from customers a pound of flesh. But that just hurts absolutely everyone. Remaining prepared to listen to your coparent and compromise with them goes a lot even more. 

Visualize you’re the little one

Maybe mothers and fathers concur to split Christmas Eve. But that usually means a large amount of shuttling all-around for the boy or girl, on what is actually previously a hectic, interesting, often too much to handle day. That’s why I convey to my clients to place on their own in their kid’s footwear and get notice of what is very best for them. 

Of course, you can split the holidays. But do you actually need to split the day? Possibly not. 

That is component of the greatest piece of tips I have for coparents: make positive you might be youngster-centered, not guardian centered. If there is certainly a person detail you and your coparent can most likely agree on, it really is that the passions of your youngsters should really arrive initial. 

Patrick Baghdaserians is a family members regulation attorney and taking care of husband or wife of Baghdaserians Law Group

Florida pastor accused of Covid fraud a no-show in court due to ‘grave medical concerns’

Florida pastor accused of Covid fraud a no-show in court due to ‘grave medical concerns’

A Florida pastor accused of fraudulently getting $8 million in Covid aid funds is in declining health and fitness and appears to be unable to discuss, his lawyer reported just after he unsuccessful to appear in court docket.

“There are grave health-related concerns,” Erin Hyde advised a federal choose in Orlando on Wednesday, in accordance to a transcript of the hearing acquired by NBC Information. 

Evan Edwards, 64, and his son Josh, 30, had been arrested at their New Smyrna Seaside residence previously in the day. They each and every face up to 30 several years in prison if convicted on the top count of conspiracy to commit lender fraud.

What was meant to be their to start with courtroom look went sideways rapid.

Evan Edwards was a no-show following he informed officers he had health-related challenges and refused to get in his wheelchair in a court keeping mobile, Assistant U.S. Legal professional Kara Wick informed the judge. 

That prompted U.S. Magistrate Choose David Baker to talk to his law firm no matter whether she had gotten the likelihood to talk to him.

“I have tried out to, Your Honor,” Hyde explained, in accordance to the transcript. “Mr. Edwards appears to be nonverbal. I really don’t know that he understood anything that I mentioned.”

Hyde extra: “I didn’t get any responses from him. If he mentioned a term or two, they had been not words and phrases in a complete sentence or that ended up appropriate to what I was conversing about.”

Baker requested that Evan Edwards be held and evaluated by a physician. 

Items took a stranger transform when the decide turned his notice to Josh Edwards, who did look in the courtroom.

Josh Edwards is taken into custody outside the Edwards family’s New Smyrna Beach home.
Josh Edwards is taken into custody outside the house the Edwards family’s New Smyrna Seaside dwelling on Wednesday.Received by NBC Information

His lawyer, Charles E. Taylor Jr., explained he experienced trouble communicating with his shopper, who suggested that he had a various law firm. Taylor informed the judge he attained out to that attorney but that the legal professional claimed he didn’t characterize Josh Edwards.

“So the most I could get out of him was he wanted to speak with his legal professional, which he did not have, and his mother and sister, who are currently in the courtroom,” Taylor mentioned.

“Your Honor, this is the initially time that I’ve had this come about. I do believe there is a competency concern in this case.”

The judge proceeded to request Josh Edwards three issues — Can you hear me? Are you in soreness? Do you comprehend where by you are? — and each elicited no response at all.

The judge then introduced that he would be purchasing a psychiatric analysis, which prompted the prosecutor to chime in.

“I have no objection to that, Your Honor,” Hyde mentioned. “I would notice for the history, however, that the brokers interacted with Mr. Josh Edwards this morning, and he was speaking and responding to them just good.”

If Josh Edwards have been pretending to be mentally incapacitated, it would not be the very first time a human being accused of a crime had feigned mental health and fitness challenges. In maybe the most well-known circumstance, mobster Vincent “The Chin” Gigante delayed his racketeering trial for yrs by acting nuts — a transfer that garnered him a next nickname, “Oddfather.”

Reputed crime boss Vincent "The Chin" Gigante is escorted to a waiting car on his way to attend court in his federal racketeering trial in New York in 1997.
Reputed criminal offense manager Vincent “The Chin” Gigante is escorted to a ready vehicle on his way to his federal racketeering demo in New York in 1997.Jon Levy / AFP via Getty Visuals

The 13-moment hearing finished with Evan Edwards’ lawyer telling the choose there had been grave issues all over his wellness.

The lawyers for Evan and Josh Edwards didn’t answer to requests for remark. 

The father and son were being taken into custody five months right after an NBC News report lifted issues over why they hadn’t been charged in the alleged scam, which federal prosecutors 1st outlined in courtroom papers in December 2020. 

The scenario centers on a Paycheck Defense Software loan application Josh Edwards submitted in April 2020. The application said the family’s spiritual group, ASLAN Global Ministry, experienced 486 workers and a regular payroll of $2.7 million.

ASLAN received an $8.4 million loan as the pandemic was raging. But federal prosecutors say the statements in the software have been bogus. 

Evan and Josh Edwards realized that ASLAN’s actual number of employees and precise regular monthly payroll fees have been “significantly reduced, or completely nonexistent,” according to an indictment unsealed Wednesday.

The two males, who are originally from Canada, have been hit with a complete of 6 rates, like conspiracy to dedicate financial institution fraud and visa fraud. 

The arrests weren’t their very first operate-in with law enforcement.

Evan and Josh Edwards
Pastor Evan Edwards and his son Josh.through Fb

In September 2020, federal agents confirmed up at the Edwardses’ home to execute a lookup warrant, but no a single was there, and the spot experienced been “cleared out,” in accordance to a civil forfeiture grievance.

Later that working day, Florida law enforcement officers pulled around the family’s Mercedes SUV as they ended up heading north on a highway in Central Florida, about 150 miles from their household, according to a police report. 

Federal brokers arrived and located a range of suspicious objects in the car or truck, which Josh Edwards was driving. 

Evan Edwards, seated in the entrance passenger seat, experienced a laser printer on his lap. In a rear passenger seat, subsequent to his wife and daughter, were being two apparent garbage baggage total of shredded documents, in accordance to the civil forfeiture grievance. 

The family’s particular digital gadgets ended up stuffed into a so-named Faraday bag, which blocks radio frequencies to hold from becoming tracked.

There had been also suitcases entire of financial data, two other Faraday baggage with laptops and tablets inside, a document shredder and many backpacks made up of external challenging drives and USB drives, the grievance suggests. 

All four members of the relatives were taken into custody. They have been billed with submitting fraudulent immigration files at the Canadian border they were produced the subsequent day after the prices had been dropped.

Six months later on, in April 2021, a federal judge in Florida purchased the forfeiture of the $8.4 million the Edwards family had acquired right after the government claimed that it was the proceeds from lender fraud and income laundering offenses. The Edwards family members did not challenge the seizure.

They experienced experimented with to use the funds to buy a $3.7 million, 4,700-sq.-foot home in a new Disney Planet enhancement known as Golden Oaks, in accordance to prosecutors. 

But the deal by no means went via. The authorities seized the $868,000 that experienced been set apart for the down payment.