Portland Diocese challenging 2021 Maine law lifting statute of limitations on childhood abuse claims

Portland Diocese challenging 2021 Maine law lifting statute of limitations on childhood abuse claims

Lawyer Michael Bigos, who signifies customers suing the Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland, speaks all through a news convention in Lewiston on Wednesday. Employees image by Shawn Patrick Ouellette/Staff members Photographer

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland is difficult the constitutionality of a condition regulation that taken off the statute of restrictions for any individual who would like to file a lawsuit alleging that they knowledgeable childhood sexual abuse in Maine.

When the legislation removing the time restrict for childhood abuse statements passed in the summer months of 2021 it opened the door for persons to sue the diocese for many years-old incidents.

The diocese says the Legislature overstepped its bounds, and that the newfound ability to sue for incidents right before 1987, which experienced been the statute of limitations in most situations, violates the two the Maine and U.S. constitutions. The attorney leading a group of new plaintiffs suing the diocese rebutted that argument Wednesday at a information convention in Lewiston.

Right after 13 individuals submitted claims in opposition to the diocese alleging the church failed to protect them from regarded abusers, the diocese filed a challenge in November, saying that lawmakers experienced no right to get rid of the statute of limits. Exceptional Court Justice Thomas McKeon will listen to the circumstance on the Business enterprise and Consumer Docket at the finish of the thirty day period.

“Maine law is clear that legislation imposing or generating legal responsibility may not do so retroactively,” the diocese argued in its problem. “If this regulation is operational, the diocese will be defending a large but presently unknowable number of circumstances that have been time-barred for two decades or more time, demanding, in the aggregate, tens of tens of millions of dollars.”

The diocese also argued that the individuals suing the church had enough time to file their complaints underneath the authentic statute of constraints. The diocese said it is at an unjust downside to defend alone in opposition to statements so aged that most witnesses, and even the priests accused of abuse, aren’t alive and equipped to participate in the authorized approach.

Legal professional Michael Bigos, symbolizing the 13 plaintiffs who have filed problems against the diocese many thanks to the 2021 law, reported Wednesday that his clientele are the kinds who have been at a drawback.

These plaintiffs have experienced from mental wellness problems stemming from the abuse, which created it complicated for them to reconcile what occurred until later on in lifestyle, Bigos stated. Their issues allege that the diocese fraudulently hid abuse by transferring accused monks all over Maine parishes and failed to notify people and other parishioners they have been at threat of abuse. That concealment wouldn’t have been safeguarded under the similar time boundaries, Bigos argued.

“No a person in Maine has ever had the ideal to sexually abuse children,” Bigos wrote in a filing Wednesday on behalf of his consumers.

The Church of the Immaculate Conception in Portland.  Jill Brady/Staff members photographer

RETROACTIVITY AND PRECEDENT

The diocese’s problem largely requires difficulty with the concept that a law enacted in 2021 can be applied retroactively.

Retroactivity is only lawfully doable, the church’s legal professional, Gerald Petruccelli, wrote in November, if it doesn’t interfere with “vested rights” that a defendant possessed in advance of a new regulation has taken outcome.

To aid make its situation, the diocese referenced pending authorized queries above the constitutionality of a voter-authorised legislation from 2021.

That case consists of the New England Thoroughly clean Electrical power Join undertaking, a 145-mile transmission corridor from Quebec to Massachusetts that would cross as a result of Maine. Even even though perform by now had started on the challenge, Maine voters handed a regulation in 2021 to halt development. Maine’s optimum court docket ruled in August that if an entity has ample “vested legal rights,” which means assets or rights they lawfully acquired just before a new statute, then the voter-permitted legislation is moot.

Bigos wrote that the NECEC situation does not implement because the courtroom would have to recognize “a house suitable in businesses and perpetrators getting in a position to sexually abuse kids.”

Bigos claimed the Legislature was certainly in its legal rights to alter point out regulation. Former Rep. Thom Harnett, who co-chaired the Judiciary Committee when the bill was debated, claimed Wednesday that he experienced predicted the diocese would challenge the legislation.

Harnett said committee members experienced their individual questions about legality and constitutionality, much too.

But following a lengthy presentation by the Maine Lawyer General’s Place of work, the committee was self-confident “that this was right and defensible,” Harnett reported.

Dmitry Bam, vice dean at the College of Maine College of Regulation, reviewed the diocese’s argument and stated he doesn’t see a “slam dunk on both aspect.”

Maine doesn’t have any case regulation on the subject, but a equivalent constitutional challenge heard in a 2015 Connecticut Supreme Courtroom situation, Doe v. Hartford, offered a summary of in which other states stood at the time.

In that ruling, Maine was outlined as a person of 24 states whose courts take into consideration retroactively applied statutes of constraints as invalid. That, Bam mentioned, could possibly favor the diocese.

“It all depends on how the court sees it, but there are undoubtedly hints in previously circumstances that Maine seems to be much more accepting of the vested rights argument,” Bam stated. “That’s the excellent detail about state constitutions. There is no federal basic principle to use below, which allows states to be inventive in how they go legislation.”

Both equally Bigos and the diocese appear to be to agree that what ever selection McKeon reaches will have an massive effect on the future of youth-serving institutions that possibility staying sued and survivors who want their day in courtroom.

The lawyers are scheduled to argue their situation in entrance of McKeon on Jan. 31.

« Preceding

Future »

Judge orders 2-day trial in Kari Lake’s lawsuit, dismisses some claims

Judge orders 2-day trial in Kari Lake’s lawsuit, dismisses some claims

A judge declined Monday to dismiss Kari Lake’s election problem soon after oral arguments by attorneys, providing her a opportunity to try to establish her claims of misconduct by election officers.

Maricopa County Remarkable Court Choose Peter Thompson tossed eight of the promises in Lake’s lawsuit, but allowed two to continue being that alleged an intentional plot by officers to manipulate the election in favor of Lake’s Democratic opponent, Secretary of Condition Katie Hobbs. In two independent orders, he ruled that a two-day trial will consider area in advance of Jan. 2, and that Hobbs and County Recorder Stephen Richer would be needed to testify as Lake wished.

Lake has “alleged intentional misconduct sufficient to have an impact on the consequence of the election and so has mentioned an concern of truth that needs likely further than the pleadings,” the ruling mentioned. It ongoing that Lake will have to present at trial that the county’s printer malfunctions were being deliberately rigged to impact the election outcomes, and that the steps “did in fact influence the outcome.”

Advanced Bionics LLC to Pay Over $12 Million for Alleged False Claims for Cochlear Implant Processors | OPA

Advanced Bionics LLC to Pay Over  Million for Alleged False Claims for Cochlear Implant Processors | OPA

Innovative Bionics LLC, a Valencia, California-dependent company of cochlear implant process products, has agreed to pay additional than $12 million to take care of allegations that it misled federal health care plans with regards to the radio-frequency (RF) emissions generated by some of its cochlear implant processors.  

“The United States expects machine brands to give precise info when they assert that their units satisfy selected checks or specifications,” stated Principal Deputy Assistant Legal professional Basic Brian M. Boynton, head of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division. “The integrity of our overall health treatment system relies upon on the authorities remaining able to rely on the information and facts presented by manufacturers when they utilize for authorization to sector their devices.”

“The FDA’s acceptance approach necessitates providers to show the efficacy of their items,” reported U.S Attorney Jacqueline C. Romero for the Japanese District of Pennsylvania. “The settlement in this circumstance demonstrates our commitment to maintain dependable any medical system company that skirts these policies and seeks Fda approval of a gadget it knows is not as productive as represented. The customers who use these devices, and the federal courses that spend for numerous of them, ought to have much better.”

The assessments at challenge measured the extent to which cochlear implant systems make RF emissions that can perhaps interfere with other devices that use the RF spectrum. These types of other gadgets may incorporate telephones, alarm and safety units, televisions and radios.

The settlement resolves allegations that Highly developed Bionics, in publishing pre-current market approval applications to the Food items and Drug Administration (Fda) for State-of-the-art Bionics’ Neptune and Naida cochlear implant processors, made bogus claims relating to the results of its RF emissions assessments. Advanced Bionics allegedly represented that its processors glad an internationally acknowledged emissions normal when, in reality, Superior Bionics did not comply with that normal. Far more particularly, State-of-the-art Bionics allegedly unsuccessful to honor the standard’s specifications to test processors utilizing “worst-case” configurations, and improperly shielded specific emissions-generating system components all through emissions testing. Advanced Bionics then allegedly sought reimbursement from Medicare, Medicaid, and other federally funded health care applications for these devices. 

“Patients should have to receive professional medical devices which are in compliance with all federal criteria,” stated Particular Agent in Charge Maureen R. Dixon of the Division of Well being and Human Companies (HHS-OIG) Workplace of the Inspector Typical. “Manufacturers are required to be truthful in submitting promises for payment to the Medicare and Medicaid Systems. HHS-OIG will proceed to get the job done with the Division of Justice and our law enforcement partners to defend the integrity of the Medicare Have confidence in Fund.” 

“The Office of Protection Business office of Inspector General’s Protection Prison Investigative Company (DCIS) is dedicated to doing the job with its law enforcement companions, together with the Department of Justice, to beat wellness care fraud,” explained Distinctive Agent in Demand Patrick J. Hegarty of the DCIS Northeast Subject Workplace. “TRICARE, the overall health treatment method for lively-obligation army staff, retirees, and dependents, relies on professional medical providers to furnish comprehensive and truthful data about the efficacy of their items and expert services. Today’s settlement demonstrates DCIS’s tireless dedication to investigating the submission of wrong claims and statements to TRICARE.”

“We hope that professional medical merchandise supplied to federal staff and their family members satisfy the benchmarks promised by the producer,” reported Unique Agent in Charge Amy K. Parker of the Office of Personnel Administration, Place of work of Inspector Common (OPM-OIG). “We applaud our law enforcement associates and colleagues at the Department of Justice for their hard operate resulting in today’s settlement.”

“The Section of Veterans Affairs Office environment of Inspector Normal (VA-OIG) is focused to guaranteeing veterans acquire the excellent healthcare products and solutions they are promised,” claimed Unique Agent in Charge Christopher Algieri of the VA-OIG Northeast Area Place of work. “In achieving today’s settlement, we thank the Department of Justice, and our legislation enforcement companions in exposing deceptive practices that impact health care products meant for veterans and the correct use of VA bucks for their benefit.”

In addition to the civil settlement, Innovative Bionics entered into a 5-12 months Company Integrity Agreement (CIA) with HHS-OIG. The CIA calls for an independent evaluate of activities and processes relating to the planning or submission of Premarket Approval Apps (PMAs) to the Fda and general performance specifications appropriate to these PMAs. Sophisticated Bionics should also carry out a robust compliance plan that contains, among other points, a danger assessment method and compliance certifications from crucial professionals and from the Board of Directors. 

The settlement gives that State-of-the-art Bionics will spend around $11.36 million to the United States, and in addition, will spend around $1.24 million to the collaborating Medicaid States, pursuant to the terms of individual settlement agreements that Sophisticated Bionics has, or will enter into, with these states.

The settlement resolves a lawsuit originally brought by David Nyberg, a former State-of-the-art Bionics engineer, less than the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the Fake Promises Act. Underneath individuals provisions, a non-public bash can file an action on behalf of the United States and receive a part of any restoration. As component of this resolution, Mr. Nyberg will get somewhere around $1.87 million of the federal settlement total.

This settlement was the final result of a coordinated effort and hard work by the Justice Department’s Civil Division’s Professional Litigation Branch, Fraud Portion and the U.S. Attorney’s Office environment for the Jap District of Pennsylvania, with aid from the Office of Overall health and Human Companies, Business of Counsel to the Inspector General and Office environment of Investigations the Defense Prison Investigative Support the Defense Well being Company Office of Typical Counsel the Workplace of Staff Management, Business of Inspector Standard the Section of Veterans Affairs, Place of work of Inspector Normal and the National Association of Medicaid Fraud Management Models.  

The investigation and resolution of this make any difference illustrates the government’s emphasis on combating healthcare fraud. One of the most effective applications in this exertion is the Untrue Promises Act. Guidelines and grievances from all sources about possible fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement, can be claimed to the Department of Wellness and Human Expert services at 800-HHS-Recommendations (800-447-8477).

Senior Trial Counsel Daniel Spiro of the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Segment, and Assistant U.S. Legal professional Lauren DeBruicker for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania prosecuted the scenario.

The lawsuit resolved by this settlement is captioned United States, et al., ex rel. Nyberg v. Superior Bionics Corp., Case No. 2:19-cv-3439 (E.D.PA.). The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only, and there has been no perseverance of legal responsibility. 

DC United Owner Dodged Taxes, Its Ex-Lawyer Claims

DC United Owner Dodged Taxes, Its Ex-Lawyer Claims
  • Jason Levien is CEO of DC United and owns component of Swansea City and the Brisbane Bullets.
  • DC United’s former typical counsel manufactured a whistleblower complaint versus him in New York.
  • The state declined to intervene. Levien denied wrongdoing and claimed he submitted New York taxes.

Jason Levien, a co-proprietor of Washington DC’s $700 million Key League Soccer workforce and an trader in experienced athletics teams in the United kingdom and Australia, has been accused by his firm’s former best lawyer of dishonest on his taxes.

Levien lied to New York officials by proclaiming to are living in Florida for many years to avoid $2.5 million to $5.2 million in city and condition taxes, according to a a short while ago unsealed complaint obtained by Insider. The lawsuit was brought by Christopher Deubert, who until eventually previous year was the major attorney for Levien’s DC United soccer club.

The case, introduced under New York’s Phony Statements Act, was submitted last calendar year under seal. It was not too long ago unsealed just after the state attorney standard declined to intervene in the scenario. A whistleblower can preserve pursuing a situation even if the point out passes on it, nevertheless, and is entitled to a share of whichever is recovered.

“Levien, born and bred in Manhattan, has taken care of his principal residence in Manhattan for virtually all his daily life, until finally a short while ago moving to Washington, DC comprehensive-time,” the grievance states. It suggests he manufactured “an estimated $2 million to $4 million” a year.

The grievance also indicates that Deubert has submitted a very similar whistleblower scenario in Washington, DC. If a complaint was submitted there, it didn’t present up in a general public databases, and a spokesman for the DC Lawyer General’s business declined to remark.

In a assertion shared with Insider, Jon Bouker, a attorney for Levien, stated his shopper compensated all the taxes he owed and submitted taxes in New York, opposite to Deubert’s promises. He mentioned the regulation firm ArentFoxSchiff employed PwC to assessment Levien’s tax returns and “concluded that Mr. Levien does not owe taxes in New York, or in any jurisdiction, returns have been filed on Mr. Levien’s behalf for tax overpayments, and Mr. Levien has correctly submitted tax returns in New York all through decades at problem.”

“Regardless of whether [Deubert’s] accusations ended up an truthful error or a little something additional destructive is a little something we will refrain from commenting on right up until we have additional data,” Bouker said. “Irrespective, it is unfortunate.” 

A particular person close to Levien told Insider that Levien is presently a DC resident for tax needs and that he has thoroughly compensated taxes in the a number of states he has lived in for the previous two a long time. 

Deubert alleges that there is “appreciable proof,” which include general public data and media interviews, that exhibits Levien has hardly ever lived in Florida, and claims that Levien and his accountant instructed Deubert that “Levien works by using his parents’ residence,” a Boca Raton condo, “for tax functions.”

Levien, a former NBA agent who received into management roles in the late 2000s, has been developing his sporting activities portfolio above the earlier ten years. In 2016, he acquired into Swansea City, a Welsh club which was relegated from the Leading League in 2018 and presently plays in the 2nd-tier Championship.

In 2021, the BBC documented he was the team’s the greater part owner and claimed to have invested “tens of tens of millions” into the group even as it has hemorrhaged funds through the pandemic.

He also hasn’t remaining basketball driving. In 2019, he and former NBA capturing guard Kevin Martin led a consortium that acquired a 75{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} stake of the Brisbane Bullets, element of Australia’s Countrywide Basketball League.

When he bought into DC United in 2012, Forbes noted that the group was valued at $50 million. That benefit has soared: Sportico reported in September that DC United is worthy of $700 million, producing it the sixth most important MLS workforce.

Levien and Indonesian businessman Erick Thohir jointly owned 60{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} of the staff when they 1st bought a stake, in accordance to Forbes. Thohir was acquired out in 2018.

Levien also has investments outdoors of sports activities. His firm Neksepo Ventures shown holdings together with Masterclass and Immortals Gaming Club, an esports venture. And a 2019 story in the Washington Company Journal about him providing a apartment he used as a visitor home for consumers and friends for $2.85 million claimed he has other homes in the District.

Deubert declined to comment, as did his lawyer, Adam Pollock.

December 14, 2022: This tale has been up to date to incorporate responses from Levien’s lawyer and a person shut to Levien. 

Connecticut Physician and Urgent Care Practice Pay Over $4.2 Million to Settle False Claims Act Allegations | USAO-CT

Advanced Bionics LLC to Pay Over  Million for Alleged False Claims for Cochlear Implant Processors | OPA

Vanessa Roberts Avery, United States Lawyer for the District of Connecticut, and Phillip Coyne, Exclusive Agent in Demand for the U.S. Office of Wellbeing and Human Solutions, Place of work of the Inspector Common, nowadays announced that JASDEEP SIDANA, M.D. and DOCS Clinical Team, INC. (performing company as Docs Professional medical), DOCS Medical INC., DOCS URGENT Care LLP, LUNG DOCS OF CT, P.C., EPIC Loved ones Physicians, LLP, and CONTINUUM Medical Group, LLC (collectively, “DOCS”), have entered into a civil settlement settlement with the federal and state governments in which they will pay back a overall of $4,267,950.21 to solve allegations that they submitted phony claims for payment to Medicare and the Connecticut Medicaid program for medically pointless allergy providers, unsupervised allergy providers, and companies improperly billed as nevertheless provided by Sidana.  The settlement also resolves allegations that Sidana and DOCS improperly billed for selected office environment visits affiliated with COVID-19 checks.

Sidana is a physician who specializes in pulmonology and is the owner and Chief Executive Officer of DOCS, a clinical apply with a lot more than 20 services in the course of Connecticut that gives a assortment of companies to its clients, including principal and urgent care, allergy testing and remedy, and COVID screening.

Medicare and Connecticut Medicaid shell out only for solutions or items that are medically needed.  Some products and services also have supervision requirements, and allergy assessments and the preparation of allergy immunotherapy should be instantly supervised by a medical professional.  Direct supervision necessitates the supervising medical doctor to be present in the exact business office suite, and immediately available to render guidance if wanted.

In early 2014, DOCS and Sidana started furnishing allergy tests and remedy companies to their individuals.  The government alleges that amongst October 1, 2016, and September 30, 2017, DOCS and Sidana submitted wrong promises to Medicare and Medicaid for immunotherapy companies that ended up not medically vital, and ended up not right supervised by a health practitioner.  The allegations also involve statements to Medicare and Medicaid for medically unnecessary annual re-screening of allergy patients involving January 1, 2014, and November 11, 2018.

The governing administration also alleges that among January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2019, DOCS and Sidana submitted statements for health care providers done by Sidana on dates of assistance when he was touring internationally and did not conduct or supervise the products and services.  Instead, the providers were truly performed by reduced-amount providers, who commonly obtain a decreased reimbursement amount from Medicare and Medicaid for such products and services.

Finally, the federal government contends that when administering assessments for COVID, DOCS and Sidana improperly billed Medicare and Connecticut Medicaid for sure evaluation and administration (“E&M”) providers, frequently referred to as business visits.  The government alleges that concerning April 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, on the identical dates that patients been given COVID-19 assessments, DOCS and Sidana submitted claims for moderately sophisticated “level 3” E&M companies, when all those amount 3 office visits ended up not in simple fact provided.

“Depriving Medicare and Medicaid packages of federal funds that have been established apart for the treatment and remedy of beneficiaries is disgraceful,” reported U.S. Legal professional Avery.  “Medical companies billed to Medicare and Medicaid will have to be provided based on each patient’s personal health-related wants.  Providers who take part in authorities systems will have to only bill for medically required companies, and must properly monthly bill for the companies delivered.  This place of work is dedicated to vigorously pursuing health and fitness care providers who submit false or fraudulent claims to federal wellbeing treatment applications.”

“Healthcare companies are anticipated to intently observe Medicare policies and invoice thoroughly — almost nothing extra, nothing a lot less,” stated Particular Agent in Cost Phillip M. Coyne of the U.S. Department of Well being and Human Expert services, Office of Inspector Common.  “When that obligation is violated, government overall health treatment systems – and American taxpayers – fork out the price.  We are dedicated to pursuing these styles of allegations together with our legislation enforcement companions as we operate to guard the integrity of our federal health care method.”

As aspect of this settlement, DOCS and Sidana have entered into a three-yr Integrity Agreement with the Section of Health and fitness and Human Services, Business office of the Inspector Common that is developed to make sure future compliance with the needs of federal healthcare packages.

This subject was investigated by the Business office of the Inspector Basic for the Department of Health and Human Solutions, and the Connecticut Office of the Attorney Typical.  This circumstance was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Legal professional Sara Kaczmarek, with the aid of Auditor Kevin Saunders, and by Deputy Affiliate Lawyer Normal Gregory O’Connell of the Lawyer General’s Business office.

Individuals who suspect health and fitness care fraud are inspired to report it by calling 1-800-HHS-Strategies or the Wellbeing Care Task Force at (203) 777-6311.

San Antonio Personal Injury Lawyer Reveals The Eric Ramos Law, PLLC Approach to Winning Injury Claims

San Antonio Personal Injury Lawyer Reveals The Eric Ramos Law, PLLC Approach to Winning Injury Claims

San Antonio, TX – Eric Ramos Regulation, PLLC is 1 of the main regulation firms presenting legal assistance and illustration to incident and private injury victims. The regulation firm has represented quite a few consumers and received a number of cases, guaranteeing that accident victims are created entire with considerable payment.

As one of the foremost damage regulation firms in the area, Eric Ramos Legislation, PLLC has just lately disclosed its solution to winning damage promises for its consumers.

When questioned what motivates him in a new job interview, the law firm’s guide lawyer, Eric Ramos, explained: “I know what it is like to reduce a beloved a person in a vehicle incident. Getting rid of a relatives member or obtaining severely injured injects a stage of chaos into your lifetime that you can in no way be all set for. I check out to do whichever is vital so my customers can care for by themselves and their households without having owning to fret about the legal implications of their tragedy. At my business office, we are very pleased to give compassionate and thorough treatment — for injured customers, we will prepare transportation, health-related cure, immediately after-hours appointments, and nearly anything else our clientele could have to have.”

San Antonio Personal Injury Lawyer Reveals The Eric Ramos Law, PLLC Approach to Winning Injury Claims

The San Antonio automobile accident attorney noted that every single new client that will come into the legislation office environment can relaxation certain that they’ll meet up with a compassionate and pleasant staff all set to listen to them and wander them via the complexities of their private personal injury situation.

The legal professional, talking on what sets them apart from other folks and how they’re ready to attain favourable success, mentioned that it all begins with the free preliminary consultation company presented to injury victims. Eric Ramos Regulation, PLLC San Antonio incident law firm notes that their no cost consultation service assists purchasers to much better have an understanding of their situation, likelihood, and the frequent mistakes that could jeopardize their likelihood of professing payment. He additional that by offering client education, they have been capable to assistance far more victims make improvements to their odds while decreasing the leverage insurance companies have above them and their instances.

He also famous that their lawful costs and charges payment arrangement has manufactured it simpler for incident victims to search for lawful assistance devoid of stressing about the fiscal implications of this kind of a final decision. Eric Ramos Law, PLLC San Antonio personalized personal injury attorney guarantees that incident victims are supplied a no-get, no-rate arrangement that protects them from upfront authorized charges and expenses right until the scenario is received and concluded. With this versatile payment arrangement, incident victims can concentrate solely on recuperation in its place of the economic implications of employing a lawful workforce to struggle for them.

Eric Ramos Regulation, PLLC is taking new clients and can be attained via mobile phone at (210) 404-4878. For far more information and facts, stop by their web page or workplace at 7979 Broadway #207, San Antonio, TX 78209, United States.

Media Contact

Business Identify
Eric Ramos Regulation, PLLC
Contact Identify
Eric Ramos
Phone
(210) 404-4878
Handle
7979 Broadway, Ste. 207
Town
San Antonio
Condition
TX
Postal Code
78209
Region
United States
Website
https://ericramoslaw.com/