Biden’s border policy to curb illegal immigration, end asylum

Biden’s border policy to curb illegal immigration, end asylum

Border officials tracked 2.3 million people crossing the southwest border in 2022 just as millions of migrants have before them, compelled by economic hardship, rising violence and oppression in their homelands.

The Biden administration responded with an unpopular plan to manage this historic influx, promoting a pandemic-era policy that leans heavily on the speedy removal of border crossers as well as a sponsorship program with new legal immigration pathways. The scheme comes amid fervent partisan squabbling, raging humanitarian crises abroad, a rise in domestic nativism and smuggling networks that are increasingly tech-savvy and well-organized. The need for the country’s leaders to find a long range solution and their inability to compromise are at a deadlock.

TIMELINE: 40 years of U.S. border policy, from Reagan and Bush to Biden

Biden’s solution to this complex conundrum follows decades of White House efforts to manage the ebb and flow of migrants along the 2,000-mile southwest border.

Like his predecessors, Biden has tried to balance humanitarian, security and economic needs with logistical realities. This review of how previous presidents tackled these same questions offers context for today’s crisis.

Undocumented Mexican commuters dash to their jobs on the U.S. side of the border, from Juarez, Mexico, to El Paso in February 1987. 

Undocumented Mexican commuters dash to their jobs on the U.S. side of the border, from Juarez, Mexico, to El Paso in February 1987. 

Carlos Antonio Rios/Houston Chronicle

Reagan

During his tenure, President Ronald Reagan ushered in one of the most significant immigration reforms in modern history – the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986.

The bill created a path to citizenship for law-abiding undocumented immigrants already living in the U.S., a process commonly known as “amnesty.” It also mandated penalties for employers who knowingly hired undocumented immigrants, during a period where many people crossing the border without authorization were Mexicans looking for work.

SPECIAL FEATURE: Haitian Odyssey: 10,000 miles in search of home

Reagan’s amnesty was successful in bringing millions of undocumented immigrants out of the shadows, however it failed to curb future illegal immigration, as it left in loopholes that gave employers the opportunity to hire people with fake documents.

Towards the end of Reagan’s run, civil war in El Salvador and governmental repression in China triggered a spike in asylum seekers from those countries. By the time George H.W. Bush took office, Congress had created Temporary Protected Status to offer some of these migrants time-limited work permits so they could stay and work in the country legally, though it did not offer a permanent visa.

President Ronald Reagan, in the Roosevelt Room, signs the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986.

President Ronald Reagan, in the Roosevelt Room, signs the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986.

National Archives

Clinton

During the 1980s, southwest border officials went from processing relatively few asylum seekers to hundreds of thousands by the 1990s, according to Muzaffar Chishti, an analyst at the Migration Policy Institute. 

“Numbers explain everything,” said Chishti. He attributes stricter asylum policies to that uptick in Central American asylum seekers at the border.

That increase, along with a newly Republican majority Congress in 1994, set a more authoritative tone towards migrants during the Clinton administration. The president deployed 400 border agents and fleets of new vehicles to patrol the border near El Paso. 

El Paso Border Patrol Agent Alfonso Trujillo does his best to police the 1,952 miles that separate the US from Mexico in February 1987. 

El Paso Border Patrol Agent Alfonso Trujillo does his best to police the 1,952 miles that separate the US from Mexico in February 1987. 

Carlos Antonio Rios/Houston Chronicle

Additionally, the Republican-led Congress drafted a major immigration bill to hasten deportation for people crossing the border illegally, a process called “expedited removal.” Exemptions were made for people who passed a credible fear interview: If they told border agents they feared persecution at home, they would be allowed to enter and make their case before an immigration judge. 

By 1997, a total of 6,300 border agents were policing the southwest border, roughly twice the number the feds had employed in 1987, according to the Cato Institute. 

Bush

President George W. Bush campaigned on comprehensive immigration reform. Any hope of legislative change was dashed within the first year of his administration, after the 9/11 terrorist attacks reframed border and immigration policy with a new laser focus on homeland security. 

Early in the Bush administration, Congress created a Department of Homeland Security and within the new agency, Customs and Border Protection. The move consolidated the border, customs, safety and security arms of the U.S. government under one roof. 

In 2006, Congress authorized 850 miles of border fence and additional Border Patrol staff. But the influx of migrants only grew and, by 2007, the undocumented immigrant population reached a peak of 12.2 million people.

Obama

Facing pressure over this record-breaking undocumented population, President Barack Obama focused, especially during his first term, on removing undocumented immigrants already living in the U.S., earning him the moniker “deporter-in-chief.” 

His administration also saw an uptick of migrants arriving for humanitarian reasons. When Obama took office, just 1{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} of border crossers were either asylum seekers or migrant children traveling alone. By 2018, that share ballooned to roughly 33{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8}, according to analysis by the Migration Policy Institute

In response, in 2012, Obama created the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which allowed undocumented young people brought to the U.S. as children to obtain work authorization and remain in the U.S. with temporary protection from deportation. 

DACA IMPACT: In 10 years of DACA, ‘Dreamers’ have worked to save lives in Houston, from Harvey to the pandemic

By the end of his tenure, Obama had deported more than 1.2 million people, more than any other president, the undocumented population had declined to 10.7 million and Border Patrol had 17,000 agents patrolling as roughly 650 miles of fencing blocked entries along the southwest border, according to the Cato Institute. 

Trump

After campaigning on a strong anti-immigrant, nativist platform, President Donald Trump made historic moves to limit the legal avenues for asylum seekers seeking humanitarian relief in the U.S. and curb the number of unauthorized border crossers. 

In 2018, Trump’s “zero tolerance” policy prompted the separation of thousands of migrant children from their parents in an effort to deter migrants from arriving at the border. 

TRUMP’S BORDER CRACKDOWN: New ‘zero tolerance’ policy overwhelms South Texas courts

The Trump administration implemented three additional policies which effectively barred certain migrants from getting asylum: the transit ban, Remain in Mexico and Title 42. Efrén Olivares, deputy legal director at the Southern Poverty Law Center, and other attorneys, have said these policies violate international treaties, international human rights laws, and domestic laws.

By the end of Trump’s term, with COVID-19 raging, border officials were denying immigrants access to asylum by quickly removing them from the country through Title 42, under a provision of the U.S. health code. 

Biden

After a dip in border crossings in 2020, during the first year of pandemic-era restrictions, the number of crossings spiked and reached record numbers when President Joe Biden took office – even though Title 42 remained intact. 

Political and economic turmoil in Latin America and the Caribbean during the pandemic spurred historic numbers along with the migrant misperceptions that Biden had more welcoming border policies. 

“Biden’s immigration rhetoric during his campaign may have been the biggest pull factor for people coming to the border,” said Chishti, the migration policy analyst.

People, mostly recently arriving Cubans, line up to sign up for federal benefits at YMCA International Services on Aug. 15, 2022, in Houston. Hundreds of Cubans are crossing the U.S.-Mexico border and coming to Houston-area refugee resettlement agencies for help starting new lives in this region. Houston historically has not been a destination for Cuban immigrants.

People, mostly recently arriving Cubans, line up to sign up for federal benefits at YMCA International Services on Aug. 15, 2022, in Houston. Hundreds of Cubans are crossing the U.S.-Mexico border and coming to Houston-area refugee resettlement agencies for help starting new lives in this region. Houston historically has not been a destination for Cuban immigrants.

Yi-Chin Lee/Staff photographer

Savvy smugglers would misrepresent Biden’s policies to migrants, giving the false impression the border was open — misinformation that was amplified by social media. 

Now, Biden’s new proposal expands the use of Trump-era Title 42 expulsions, allowing border officials to quickly send away migrants at the border and stop them from seeking asylum, while also providing safe, legal opportunities for Haitians, Cubans and Nicaraguans to enter the country. 

Houston immigration attorney Ruby Powers said after years of inconsistencies of how asylum seekers are treated at the border, she sees the new plan as a step in the right direction. 

“I think we’re turning a corner and trying to be more humane and understanding,” said Powers, “It’s not perfect, but I think I’m seeing some improvement.” 

Opioid-involved car crashes plummeted following efforts to curb use

Opioid-involved car crashes plummeted following efforts to curb use

People today taking prescription opioids are extra than 2 times as very likely to be concerned in a automobile incident than those who aren’t, study has shown. In reality, in between the early 1990s and early 2010s, as opioid use rose sharply in the United States, the number of fatalities among the motorists working with prescription opioids elevated seven-fold.

Less obvious is the extent to which opioid use could possibly also lead to injuries ensuing from non-deadly car or truck incidents — and regardless of whether attempts to prohibit opioid prescriptions in excess of the past ten years, like stricter new federal tips, have prompted a decline in incidents.

To remedy these inquiries, Yale scientists for a new analyze quantified how a lot of U.S. motorists involved in non-fatal automobile injuries from 2014 to 2018 had opioid prescriptions at the time of their incidents. They identified that prevalence of prescriptions between these motorists certainly dropped noticeably following the Facilities for Sickness Management and Avoidance (CDC) released new recommendations for prescribing opioids in 2016.

The conclusions counsel that initiatives to suppress opioid prescriptions — and the harm opioids can trigger — are performing, the researchers say.

The opioid crisis has been a devastating blow to the U.S. with a drop in lifestyle expectancy, chaos in total communities and areas, and untold human distress,” explained Sten Vermund, the Anna M.R. Lauder Professor at Yale College of Public Wellbeing and an author of the analyze. “Our examine documents that with mitigation of opioid use, traffic accident accidents in which use of prescription opioids was involved declined significantly, a significant indirect profit of helping persons with opioid use ailment lessen their intake.”

The research was released Nov. 4 in the Intercontinental Journal of Environmental Exploration and General public Overall health.

For the research, the investigation team collected info from IBM MarketScan Databases, which have de-determined facts on 255 million men and women with employer-supplied health and fitness insurance coverage from just about every U.S. condition and Washington, D.C. Utilizing this trove of info, the scientists identified 142,204 unexpected emergency office visits related to car or truck mishaps from 2014 to 2018 and assessed regardless of whether the wounded drivers had an active opioid prescription at the time. (Details on opioid use at the time of an accident is limited by inconsistencies in drug screening and reporting, so prescriptions serve as an indirect evaluate of use.)

The prevalence of active opioid prescriptions among those people with non-lethal car crash accidents dropped just about every year of their investigation. Compared to 2014 concentrations, opioid prescription fees dropped by 5{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} in 2015, 18{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} in 2016, 31{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} in 2017, and 49{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} in 2018.

This was a shock to us, in section, due to the fact we listen to mainly detrimental information about opioids” reported Lan Jin, a researcher in the Section of Neurosurgery at Yale Faculty of Medication and lead writer of the analyze. “But this is a exceptional piece of fantastic news, and it implies the steps taken by the CDC and other individuals have worked.”

In 2016, the CDC issued a new set of guidelines for prescribing opioids to take care of chronic soreness to address the opioid disaster. The suggestions resolved when to initiate or proceed opioid prescriptions for continual soreness, made available steering on which prescription drugs to use, what dosages to provide, and prescription size, and delivered procedures for evaluating the hazard of and addressing harm induced by opioid use.

We identified that non-deadly crashes connected with opioids lowered by 28{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} following the CDC published its recommendations, suggesting that improved prescription procedures may possibly have helped not simply minimize prescription opioid use alone, but also opioid-linked motor motor vehicle crash accidents,” explained Vermund.

The CDC has not been by yourself in attempting to cut down opioid use — lawmakers and agencies at the condition and federal concentrations have taken measures as nicely. These incorporate actions to limit opioid supply, like by way of drug choose-again applications, limits on dispensing and prescribing opioids, and digital databases that monitor prescription prevalence. Efforts have also been produced to lessen desire through specific individual instruction and initiatives to raise healthcare treatment options for opioid use condition.

There is been a incredibly thorough marketing campaign targeting both the drug manufacturing facet and the professional medical service provider side to make sure that the use of opioids for persistent discomfort outcomes in considerably less damage,” mentioned Jin. “This review delivers a good be aware for these forms of policies and likely ahead, policymakers and businesses like the CDC really should think about utilizing them prior to medication with extreme adverse outcomes turn into obtainable to the general public and right before tragedy strikes.”

Opioid-involved car crashes decrease following efforts to curb use

Opioid-involved car crashes plummeted following efforts to curb use

People using prescription opioids are much more than 2 times as likely to be involved in a auto accident than all those who aren’t, investigate has shown. In fact, amongst the early 1990s and early 2010s, as opioid use rose sharply in the United States, the number of fatalities among motorists using prescription opioids greater seven-fold.

Less very clear is the extent to which opioid use could possibly also add to accidents ensuing from non-deadly vehicle incidents — and whether endeavours to restrict opioid prescriptions over the previous 10 years, including stricter new federal rules, have triggered a decrease in mishaps.

To response these thoughts, Yale researchers for a new study quantified how lots of U.S. motorists included in non-fatal auto injuries from 2014 to 2018 had opioid prescriptions at the time of their incidents. They observed that prevalence of prescriptions between these motorists indeed dropped noticeably right after the Centers for Disease Command and Avoidance (CDC) unveiled new guidelines for prescribing opioids in 2016.

The findings recommend that initiatives to suppress opioid prescriptions — and the damage opioids can cause — are functioning, the scientists say.

The opioid disaster has been a devastating blow to the U.S. with a drop in life expectancy, chaos in total communities and locations, and untold human distress,” claimed Sten Vermund, the Anna M.R. Lauder Professor at Yale University of Public Health and fitness and an author of the review. “Our analyze documents that with mitigation of opioid use, targeted visitors incident accidents in which use of prescription opioids was involved declined considerably, a major indirect benefit of aiding folks with opioid use condition lessen their consumption.”

The review was released Nov. 4 in the Global Journal of Environmental Study and Community Wellbeing.

For the review, the analysis team gathered details from IBM MarketScan Databases, which contain de-recognized facts on 255 million men and women with employer-offered wellness coverage from each individual U.S. point out and Washington, D.C. Working with this trove of data, the researchers identified 142,204 emergency section visits connected to car or truck incidents from 2014 to 2018 and assessed irrespective of whether the injured motorists experienced an lively opioid prescription at the time. (Details on opioid use at the time of an accident is restricted by inconsistencies in drug testing and reporting, so prescriptions provide as an oblique measure of use.)

The prevalence of active opioid prescriptions among the all those with non-deadly motor vehicle crash injuries dropped each individual year of their assessment. As opposed to 2014 concentrations, opioid prescription fees dropped by 5{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} in 2015, 18{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} in 2016, 31{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} in 2017, and 49{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} in 2018.

This was a shock to us, in aspect, due to the fact we listen to typically destructive information about opioids” stated Lan Jin, a researcher in the Office of Neurosurgery at Yale University of Medication and guide creator of the analyze. “But this is a scarce piece of great information, and it indicates the measures taken by the CDC and other individuals have labored.”

In 2016, the CDC issued a new established of tips for prescribing opioids to deal with continual suffering to handle the opioid crisis. The pointers dealt with when to initiate or continue on opioid prescriptions for chronic suffering, available steering on which prescription drugs to use, what dosages to present, and prescription length, and supplied strategies for examining the hazard of and addressing damage prompted by opioid use.

We found that non-lethal crashes associated with opioids decreased by 28{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} just after the CDC revealed its recommendations, suggesting that enhanced prescription procedures may well have aided not just minimize prescription opioid use itself, but also opioid-linked motor car crash injuries,” stated Vermund.

The CDC hasn’t been by itself in making an attempt to lessen opioid use — lawmakers and organizations at the condition and federal concentrations have taken actions as nicely. These consist of steps to restrict opioid supply, like by drug take-back plans, constraints on dispensing and prescribing opioids, and electronic databases that watch prescription prevalence. Attempts have also been designed to reduce need by targeted affected person instruction and initiatives to boost health care solutions for opioid use ailment.

There is been a extremely detailed campaign concentrating on equally the drug manufacturing aspect and the healthcare supplier side to make absolutely sure that the use of opioids for chronic suffering final results in less damage,” said Jin. “This review gives a constructive be aware for these forms of insurance policies and going ahead, policymakers and corporations like the CDC ought to consider applying them in advance of medication with intense adverse outcomes grow to be obtainable to the public and ahead of tragedy strikes.”