Sanctions for bogus election lawsuits spurs GOP proposal to protect attorneys from punishment

Sanctions for bogus election lawsuits spurs GOP proposal to protect attorneys from punishment

Angry at lawyers being disciplined for making baseless election fraud issues in Arizona courts, a Republican legislator claims the Condition Bar of Arizona and the Arizona Supreme Courtroom should be barred from punishing people lawyers and be heavily fined if they do so. 

The bill from Sen. Anthony Kern, R-Glendale, prohibits both the Point out Bar and the Arizona Supreme Court docket from “infringing” or “impeding” on the “political speech” of an lawyer or an attorney’s customers by disciplining them or revoking their licenses for “bringing a excellent faith, non frivolous declare that is primarily based in regulation and simple fact to court docket.” 

If they’re deemed to be in violation of the proposed law, they would forfeit 10{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} of their profits. For the Bar, that would arrive from the cash it raises through attorney membership dues, although the Supreme Court docket would see its budget reduce as punishment. The penalties would equate to about $1 million for the Bar and virtually $10 million for the Supreme Courtroom.

GET THE Early morning HEADLINES Delivered TO YOUR INBOX

Courts commonly implement civil legislation like the a person Kern is proposing, but it’s unclear who would determine if the court docket or the Bar is in violation of this measure. The laws is silent on the make a difference.

The Arizona Supreme Court docket and the State Bar the two denounced the measure. 

“Attorneys are not disciplined for bringing great faith promises,” the Condition Bar mentioned in a statement presented to the Arizona Mirror. “The experienced ethics guidelines governing the carry out of lawful gurus prohibit attorneys from bringing frivolous litigation that is not in very good faith.” 

The Bar said the legislation is “unnecessary.” and noted that courts exist “to deliver message boards to quite resolve disputes within just the bounds of professional ethics rules” and need to not be a “general discussion board for political expression.”

The Supreme Courtroom also said there was no trouble needing to be mounted by this proposed regulation. 

“Lawyers are not — nor have they ever been — topic to discipline due to the fact of their political views or speech,” the Arizona Supreme Courtroom stated in a statement to the Mirror. “Current court docket guidelines are very crystal clear on the causes why an legal professional might be matter to disciplinary motion — political speech is not one of them. 

“The court docket is a discussion board with a function to rather solve disputes within the bounds of professional ethics procedures. The courts are not a forum for political speech when that speech does not have a basis in fact or regulation.” 

Kern’s Senate Monthly bill 1092 will come as lawyers across the state and in Arizona have confronted disciplinary action and revocation of their licenses for bringing issues to the election based mostly on frivolous claims of election fraud as effectively as lawsuits in opposition to political rivals. 

Kern, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, told senators that a single inspiration for his proposal is that a member in the condition Property of Associates almost experienced his license revoked for bringing a lawsuit. He also admitted that he did not like the Condition Bar of Arizona. 

“I don’t like what they do and I really do not like how they’re established up,” Kern mentioned.  

Newly elected condition Rep. Alexander Kolodin, R-Scottsdale, has been a go-to attorney for Republicans for a number of election-related lawsuits. He was also one particular of nine lawyers that had Bar grievances submitted against them for symbolizing Donald Trump’s 2020 marketing campaign in a failed lawsuit that falsely claimed overvotes impacted the Arizona election. 

There is also a personalized ax to grind for Kern. Alongside with former point out legislator Mark Finchem and U.S. Rep. Paul Gosar, he introduced a lawsuit towards former Democratic lawmaker Charlene Fernandez accusing her of defamation for a letter that she signed with 43 other Democratic members of the legislature inquiring for the Office of Justice to investigate the trios job in the January 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol. 

The 3 Republicans dropped the accommodate and ended up explained to to pay out $75,000 in attorney fees to Fernandez. They are inquiring for the situation to be appealed and reinstated

Finchem himself has been sanctioned two times by the courts

“I believe that in free speech and I really do not want to see individuals get penalized,” Kern instructed his colleagues when the Senate Judiciary Committee viewed as his measure on Feb. 9, adding that “wokeness” makes difficulties for attorneys. “Your occupation should really not be penalized no matter what you consider.”

Democratic keyed in on Kern’s worry about “wokeness” and requested him to outline what it indicates. He replied that it was a philosophy that aims to “ruin constructions that have been in put for years…under the guise of Marxism, socialism.”

Sen. John Kavanagh, R-Fountain Hills, employed the crowdsourced web-site City Dictionary, which has been regarded to host racist articles thanks to lax moderation guidelines, to define the phrase “woke.” 

“I, myself, have not formulated my very own personalized definition,” Kavanagh admitted to the committee just after looking through two definitions from the website. 

The invoice handed alongside social gathering strains and will head future to the entire Senate for thought.

Attorney sanctions upheld in ‘utterly baseless’ lawsuit challenging 2020 election

Attorney sanctions upheld in ‘utterly baseless’ lawsuit challenging 2020 election

  • Lawyers ought to pay out authorized fees to Fb, Dominion
  • Lawsuit portion of wave of unsuccessful claims around presidential race

(Reuters) – A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday upheld virtually $187,000 in financial sanctions in opposition to two lawyers who filed and dropped an “utterly baseless” lawsuit hard Democrat Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential get around his Republican rival Donald Trump.

The unanimous ruling by a 3-choose panel of the 10th U.S. Circuit Courtroom of Appeals in Colorado reported Denver lawyers Gary Fielder and Ernest Walker need to fork out the authorized charges of election gear maker Dominion Voting Devices Inc, Facebook father or mother Meta Platforms Inc and other defendants accused in the lawsuit of meddling in the election.

The Denver-centered appeals courtroom affirmed the sanction primarily based on the “inherent electrical power” of judges and also a federal regulation that suggests a attorney can be liable for costs for “unreasonably and vexatiously” extending a court docket circumstance.

“An legal professional is predicted to exercise judgment, and will have to ‘regularly re-assess the merits’ of statements and ‘avoid prolonging meritless claims,'” 10th Circuit Chief Judge Jerome Holmes, sitting with Circuit Judges Timothy Tymkovich and Veronica Rossman, wrote in their unsigned get. The panel known as the legal arguments underpinning the case “totally baseless.”

The lawsuit was portion of a wave of failed attempts contesting the 2020 election.

In some cases, get-togethers sought sanctions towards the legal professionals who submitted election lawsuits, and in other situations judges acted on their individual to sanction lawyers. Attorney licensing officers in Washington, D.C., Texas and elsewhere have opened ethics investigations from some legal professionals who pursued election promises backing Trump’s meritless assertion that Biden stole victory from him.

In a assertion on Tuesday, Fielder stated “under no circumstances did we believe that our steps were unethical or frivolous.” He stated “affirmation of sanctions imposed from us will have a chilling outcome on other legal professionals” in long term circumstances.

Fielder stated he and Walker will request the 10th Circuit to rehear their dispute and will flip to the U.S. Supreme Court docket “if necessary.”

Regarding Tuesday’s ruling, Stanley Garnett, a lawyer for Dominion Voting at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, stated that “Dominion hopes that this sort of orders will prevent lawyers from submitting in the same way frivolous litigation in the long run.”

Lawyers for Meta at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher did not straight away answer to a request for comment. Reps from Dominion and Meta also did not instantly reply to messages seeking remark.

The court’s order explained Dominion Voting was entitled to about $62,900, and Meta would obtain about $50,000.

Other defendants who will be paid fees consist of condition officials in Michigan and Pennsylvania, in addition to the Middle for Tech and Civic Lifestyle.

The case is O’Rourke v. Dominion Voting Methods Inc, 10th U.S. Circuit Courtroom of Appeals, No. 21-1442.

For plaintiffs: Gary Fielder of Regulation Business of Gary Fielder, and Ernest Walker of Ernest J. Walker Law Office.

For Dominion: Stanley Garnett of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

(Note: This short article was current with comment from Dominion Voting’s attorney.)

Browse a lot more:

Giuliani ‘weaponized his regulation license’ in 2020 election circumstance – ethics counsel

Trump ally Sidney Powell asks court to overturn sanctions around election lawsuit

Trump ally Sidney Powell loses bid to end Wisconsin’s sanctions attractiveness

Law firm loses problem to judge’s ethics referral right after failed election lawsuit

Our Specifications: The Thomson Reuters Trust Concepts.

“Desperate and delusional”: Legal experts rip Kari Lake’s “poorly written” election lawsuit

“Desperate and delusional”: Legal experts rip Kari Lake’s “poorly written” election lawsuit

Unsuccessful Arizona Republican gubernatorial applicant Kari Lake’s lawsuit looking for to overturn the 2022 midterm election will probable be thrown out thanks to the generic claims it can make, which are not supported by any evidence, authorized gurus say. 

Lake, who was endorsed by previous President Donald Trump, misplaced by far more than 17,000 votes to Democratic Secretary of State Katie Hobbs. She submitted the 70-web site lawsuit in Maricopa County Top-quality court late previous 7 days, saying that the election in the county was flawed by “intentional misconduct.” 

The accommodate also alleges the “hacking” of election tools to disenfranchise Republican voters and the inclusion of “unlawful ballots [that] contaminated the election.” Lake has demanded that the court docket possibly declares her the winner or invalidate the effects of the election and perform a new just one.

The 1st hearing for Lake’s fit is established for Tuesday, but lawful industry experts say that it should be swiftly dismissed as it fails to make unique claims. 

“It is improperly composed, frankly,” Democratic election lawyer Jim Barton told the Arizona Mirror. “It is so lengthy and meandering. I believe the fundamental promises are terrible and the lawsuit is horrible and it truly is, frankly, uncomfortable that this variety of point can get submitted.”

Barton, whose previous purchasers have bundled candidates and ballot strategies, explained that Lake’s statements do not offer the degree of specificity desired to file a lawsuit. He additional that lawsuits demanding the effects of elections need to be “tightly designed”, mainly because “airing generic grievances does not operate in this context.”

Condition law generally dictates that election issues must be primarily based on misconduct by election boards, ineligibility of a prospect, bribery or a different offense, unlawful votes, or an faulty vote count.

This is in stark distinction to some of the generic statements Lake can make in her fit, which consists of no actual evidence, but somewhat anecdotes of “chaos” at the Maricopa County polling destinations on Election Working day, the inclusion of “illegal ballots,” and supposedly “hacked” election gear.

“I really don’t imagine this circumstance will go really significantly and will possibly be dismissed really immediately,” College of Iowa Legislation professor Derek Muller stated in an job interview with the Mirror. “She dropped by a important margin. There are quite several particular facts. There are plenty of aspects that are striving to relitigate the 2020 election.”

Muller added that he was “surprised” by just how significantly of Lake’s lawsuit regurgitated statements from the 2020 election worries. “There’s just not a wonderful path ahead dependent on the speculative types of statements that are remaining produced in this grievance,” he explained.

Lake also asserts that some mail-in ballot signatures did not match the types on file, but does not cite any evidence to again up the declare. The only example of a mismatched signature that she offered in fact came from a 2020 ballot. 

“You will find no indicator that the processes were not adopted for how signature-matching is meant to come about,” Muller described. “It just form of says the figures search funny to them and, with no additional, that’s seriously hard to demonstrate.” 


Want a day-to-day wrap-up of all the information and commentary Salon has to give? Subscribe to our early morning newsletter, Crash System.


Generally, election satisfies display proof of fraud and include testimony from witnesses who describe instances of voter intimidation or offer proof of stolen ballots. Even so, Muller claims that these are lacking from Lake’s grievance — alternatively, she focuses on the form of voting devices utilised and what ballot envelopes looked like.

Muller also thinks that Lake’s lawful workforce is not skilled when it arrives to election disputes. Her lawyers include things like Scottsdale divorce attorney Bryan Blehm, who formerly represented Cyber Ninjas in an “audit” of the 2020 election in Maricopa County, and D.C. company lawyer Kurt Olsen, who attempted to toss out the final results of battleground states that Trump missing in 2020. 

The accommodate begins by citing polling figures from Rasmussen Studies, which questioned voters throughout the nation if they agreed that the Maricopa County election was “botched.” Of those people that responded to the poll, 72 {c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} of likely voters explained they agreed with Lake, but her lawyers failed to recognize that community view has no body weight in a situation like this. 

“The quotation to polling numbers is weird,” Barton stated. He claimed that the references to the polling information had extra to do with publicity than the final result of the match, to which Muller agreed. 

“Some complaints are prepared to double as press releases,” Muller defined. “You will see problems, with tone and rhetoric, that are designed to form of acquire general public awareness.” 

College of Texas Law professor Stephen Vladeck included in an email to the Mirror that Lake’s rhetorical posturing is very similar to that of the election lawsuits in 2020. “Regrettably, it is turn into a typical tactic amongst election deniers,” he mentioned. “The good news is, it has not been a productive one. And I suspect Lake’s lawsuit is heading for a related destiny as all of the 2020 election scenarios — not succeeding.”

Previous federal prosecutor and College of Baltimore legislation professor Kimberly Wehle also slammed Lake’s “garbage” lawsuit in an write-up printed by The Bulwark, a conservative news outlet. 

“Kari Lake, the loser of the Arizona gubernatorial race, has submitted match in Arizona condition courtroom towards Katie Hobbs, the governor-elect and latest secretary of condition, alongside with a slew of election officials, tough the election final result à la the Major Lie 2020,” Wehle writes. “Like Donald Trump in advance of her, Lake is making an attempt to use the courts to develop political soundbites to feed the base — in spite of an clear absence of supportive facts or law.”

Wehle provides that Lake has nonetheless to acquire traction from the MAGA foundation, inspite of making use of Trump’s techniques from 2020. “Her lawful situation appears to be like a loser, also,” Wehle suggests. “We know this in aspect since Lake presently experimented with a pre-election lawsuit, back again in April.” 

In the April match, Lake requested a federal courtroom to demand that Arizona only use paper ballots for the November election, alleging that digital machines are much more susceptible to fraud because of to hacking. 

“Problems is, Arizona does not even use the sort of contact-display screen method her lawsuit sought to decommission,” Wehle clarifies. 

Wehle also pointed to how U.S. District Choose John Tuchi sanctioned Lake’s attorneys — which include Alan Dershowitz — previously this thirty day period for filing their statements with out conducting “the factual and authorized pre-submitting inquiry that the circumstances of this circumstance moderately permitted and necessary.” 

“What the likes of Trump and Lake realize — and what evades non-lawyers — is that litigants can file any kind of rubbish to initiate a lawsuit,” she writes. “You will find no automatic gatekeeper at the courthouse doorway banning bogus instances that have no foundation in fact or legislation.”

Arizona Republic columnist Laurie Roberts also examined Lake’s “determined and delusional” match in her Monday column, describing that the statements were being devoid of any material.

“In a nutshell, her lawsuit is 70 web pages of grievance and disbelief, sprinkled with regular flights of fancy,” she writes. “A great deal of woulda couldas about the lots of techniques in which Hobbs and Maricopa County election officials stole Lake’s victory. The only matter missing is any precise proof that they did.”

Like Muller, Roberts thinks that Lake’s attorneys are inexperienced, and writes that the usual team of Republican lawyers that do the job on election disputes are notably absent from her workforce.

“It is uncomplicated to location their handiwork,” Roberts suggests of the perform of Lake’s lawyers in the lawsuit, which contains conspiratorial language and implicates other Arizona Republicans.

“In accordance to the lawsuit, [Governor elect Katie] Hobbs and Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer ended up portion of a ‘secret censorship operation’ coordinated by the federal Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection Company,” she writes, adding that Lake’s lawsuit is “destined” to are unsuccessful.

Read through additional

about Kari Lake

Kari Lake files lawsuit in Maricopa County, alleging election laws were broken

Kari Lake files lawsuit in Maricopa County, alleging election laws were broken

Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake has filed a lawsuit from Maricopa County elections officials, alleging they broke election legal guidelines. Lake also claimed that 118 polling facilities appeared to have a “printer/tabulation difficulty,” whilst officials formerly mentioned there ended up 60 polling centers with printer challenges that were fixed before polls closed.  

Democrat Katie Hobbs, who currently serves as Arizona secretary of state, was projected as the winner of the race 10 times ago. Lake, a shut ally of previous President Donald Trump who has refused to accept President Joe Biden gained the 2020 election, has not however conceded the governor’s race. 

Lake announced the lawsuit Wednesday on Steve Bannon’s podcast “War Room,” calling the 2022 election “the shoddiest election at any time, in historical past.”

“We want some information,” Lake mentioned. “We are on a timeline, a very strict timeline when it will come to combating this botched election, and they are dragging their feet.”  

GOP Candidates Attend Arizona Republican Party Election Night Event
Arizona Republican gubernatorial nominee Kari Lake speaks to supporters throughout her election night celebration at The Scottsdale Resort at McCormick Ranch on November 08, 2022 in Scottsdale, Arizona.

/ Getty Images


On Election Working day, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors chairman Monthly bill Gates mentioned there ended up 60 polling web sites that had printing issues, and they were being fastened just before polls shut. Gates claimed then that the printer challenge was technical — the ink didn’t print darkish more than enough for the equipment to be readable.

But Lake alleged in the lawsuit that “due to the fact of the printer/tabulator troubles, the polling destinations have been chaotic, voters were annoyed, and voters had to endure extended strains.” 

Lake’s lawsuit also asks for a number of public information, particularly linked to canvassing. The submitting claims that without obtain to the asked for data, the plaintiff “can’t verify the comprehensive extent of the issues determined and their impacts on electors.”

Lake introduced a video last week saying she experienced “assembled the most effective and brightest lawful group, and we are exploring every avenue to proper the numerous wrongs that have been carried out this earlier 7 days.” 

Lake has been alleging difficulties in Maricopa County, Arizona’s largest county which encompasses Phoenix, because Election Working day. On Nov. 9, she explained on Fox News that the point out had “shoddy elections that are operate by imbeciles” and if elected, she claimed she would simply call a specific session of the Arizona Legislature to tackle it.

She also said elections officers have been “gradual rolling” the ballot counting method, an allegation that Gates reported on Nov. 10 was “offensive.” 

“We’re definitely not slow-rolling it and if their workforce had been shelling out awareness in advance of the election, they would have read us communicate about this more than and around yet again, that we would not have outcomes on election evening or even the up coming working day,” Gates said. “That it was going to get many days. And fairly frankly it is offensive for Kari Lake to say these people at the rear of me are sluggish rolling this when they are doing work 14-18 hours.”  

Defamation lawsuit targets group behind “2,000 Mules” election denial film : NPR

Defamation lawsuit targets group behind “2,000 Mules” election denial film : NPR

Catherine Engelbrecht, seen here in 2015, founded the controversial nonprofit True the Vote. A new lawsuit alleges that Engelbrecht and True the Vote defamed a small company that makes software for election workers.

Anadolu Agency/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Anadolu Agency/Getty Images


Catherine Engelbrecht, seen here in 2015, founded the controversial nonprofit True the Vote. A new lawsuit alleges that Engelbrecht and True the Vote defamed a small company that makes software for election workers.

Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

Konnech, a small Michigan company that makes election logistics software, says a “smear campaign” whipped up by the controversial group True the Vote has led to death threats and forced the company’s CEO to leave home in fear for his and his family’s lives. The company believes a driving force behind the threats is xenophobia; Konnech’s CEO immigrated to the U.S. from China in the 1980s and became an American citizen in 1997.

In the past, the executive of a relatively unknown company might have chosen to ignore such claims to try to deprive them of attention.

But in the wake of the conspiracy-fueled Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, and in the era of QAnon and Pizzagate — bizarre and baseless theories that have contributed to very real violence — that strategy may no longer be tenable. The experience of the election technology company Dominion Voting Systems, which became the target of widespread conspiracy theories about the 2020 election, also underscored how wild claims could significantly damage a company’s business.

Just a few weeks after accusations against the company first surfaced, Konnech turned to the federal courts and filed a lawsuit. Konnech was “not going to take any chances and felt very strongly that it needed to act and act quickly,” said Jon Goldberg, a company spokesperson.

Konnech, which makes scheduling software for poll workers, joined a growing number of election officials and companies that have used defamation law to try to fight back against election-related conspiracies.

Dominion Voting Systems, as well as another election technology company, Smartmatic, have filed multiple lawsuits against media outlets and prominent Trump-world figures that spread allegedly defamatory claims about them in the 2020 election. Georgia election workers Ruby Freeman and Wandrea Moss, the latter of whom testified in front of the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, have also filed lawsuits alleging that they were defamed by election conspiracy theories and subjected to “vitriol, threats, and harassment.” A Pennsylvania postal service employee also took legal action, and alleged that he was falsely accused of manipulating vote-by-mail ballots in the 2020 election. Conspiracy theories about the 2020 election have continued to spread, but there’s some indication that these lawsuits have pushed such claims farther from the mainstream of conservative media and toward the fringes, with some on the self-publishing digital newsletter platform Substack.

Konnech’s lawsuit targets True the Vote, which has made a name for itself with dubious claims of widespread voter fraud, including the film “2,000 Mules,” and has been increasingly linked to QAnon. Konnech claims in its lawsuit that True the Vote and its leaders, Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips, have falsely accused Konnech of orchestrating “a red Chinese communist op run against the United States” and improperly accessed Konnech’s data.

“I will state clearly and unequivocally: neither Eugene Yu nor Konnech are in any way associated with the Chinese Communist Party,” said Goldberg.

In an unusual move, a federal judge agreed to issue a temporary restraining order against True the Vote, which requires the group to turn over “all property and data obtained from Konnech’s protected computers,” and blocks True the Vote from “using, disclosing, or exploiting the property and data downloaded from Konnech’s protected computers.”

Additionally, Goldberg, the company’s spokesperson, told NPR that the company “has been and is working closely with law enforcement at multiple levels regarding True the Vote’s claims.”

The company also added an “election misinformation advisory” to its website to try to combat “false and malicious claims” from True the Vote.

True the Vote has denied any wrongdoing. “Everything we have ever said about any of this is true,” said Engelbrecht in a livestream the day the lawsuit was filed. “The allegations made by Konnech are meritless. True the Vote looks forward to a public conversation about Konnech’s attempts to silence examination of its activities through litigation.”

A representative of True the Vote also provided NPR with a letter sent to Konnech’s attorney, which claims that Konnech has made unspecified “inaccuracies and misrepresentations” to the court, and asserts that an unnamed “third party” first obtained Konnech’s data — not True the Vote.

How the threat of legal action affected “2,000 Mules”

Engelbrecht and Phillips previously executive produced and provided the research for the widely debunked election conspiracy theory film, “2,000 Mules.” And there’s some indication that the threat of defamation lawsuits may have slowed the spread of claims from the film.

The right-wing provocateur Dinesh D’Souza, who directed “2,000 Mules,” said that he decided not to include “ballot trafficking” allegations against specific, named organizations in the film due to legal concerns. Fox News has largely avoided covering the “2,000 Mules,” which D’Souza suggested is related to Fox’s fear of litigation.

Last month, the publisher of an upcoming book version of “2,000 Mules” also abruptly recalled copies from bookstores. NPR obtained the recalled version of the book, which, unlike the film, makes allegations against specific nonprofit groups, and accuses them of “organized crime.”

After one of those groups said the book’s contents were completely false and potentially “libelous,” True the Vote distanced itself from the book.

Meanwhile, the group has pivoted away from the “2,000 Mules” and toward Konnech.

True the Vote weaves a spy novelesque story

At an event in August dubbed “The Pit,” Engelbrecht and Phillips unveiled what they called the “Tiger Project,” which focused on Konnech. In interviews with far-right podcasters, Phillips has spun a cloak-and-dagger story that he compared to a James Bond movie, in which he helped uncover a supposed Chinese plot to infiltrate American elections.

In Phillips’ telling, he first heard about the company from “my guys” — unnamed “colleagues and friends” who invited him to their room in the Hilton Anatole hotel in Dallas one late night in January 2021.

“I get there and they’re putting towels, rolled up towels, under the doors and you know, and all my guys are armed,” Phillips said on the podcast “1819 News.”

Phillips said his colleagues showed him personal information for 1.8 million American poll workers, including “name, address, date of birth, Social Security number, banking information,” which supposedly was held on a server in China.

Konnech maintains that this claim is entirely false, and that all of its data on American customers is stored solely in the U.S.

After seeing this presentation, Phillips claims that he and Engelbrecht brought Konnech’s data to the FBI, which he claims then worked with them for more than a year on a supposed “counterintelligence” operation looking into Konnech. At one point, Phillips said he had a “secret squirrels” meeting with the FBI in Milwaukee to share information. Eventually, however, the FBI “completely betrayed us,” Phillips said, and told True the Vote that they were themselves under scrutiny from law enforcement.

True the Vote has not publicly provided evidence to support the claim of a “counterintelligence” operation along those lines, nor has NPR found any corroboration. The FBI did not respond to a request for comment.

True the Vote’s appeal to QAnon

Konnech argues that this wild story is a work of fiction.

“Konnech is extremely confident in the multiple levels of security it employs to protect its customers’ data,” said Goldberg, who noted that Konnech does not even possess information on 1.8 million poll workers. The real number is under 250,000, the company says. But rather than ignore True the Vote’s claims that they saw Konnech’s secure data, Goldberg said, Konnech essentially decided to take True the Vote’s claims at face value. In their lawsuit, Konnech alleges that True the Vote admitted to violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act by accessing the company’s data.

At least so far, the claims against Konnech have not received widespread attention in more established conservative media. This case still demonstrates how allegations can spread through fringe online networks.

Phillips has specifically encouraged followers of the far-right QAnon conspiracy theory — so-called “anons” — to research and post about Konnech.

“These people are the most amazing patriots that I’ve ever come in contact with,” Phillips said of QAnon followers. Phillips also appeared on an online show hosted by QAnon influencers, where he reiterated his praise of the “anons.” The left-leaning media watchdog group Media Matters documented additional ties between True the Vote and QAnon. In a sign of how QAnon has moved closer to the mainstream of the Republican Party, former President Donald Trump has repeatedly posted messages from the group’s followers online, and featured a QAnon-linked song at a rally over the weekend.

A digital newsletter hosted by the online platform Substack has amplified the idea that Konnech represents “Chinese infiltration” of U.S. election systems. A spokesperson for Substack declined NPR’s request for comment.

Former Trump adviser turned podcaster Steve Bannon further promoted that Substack newsletter about Konnech in a post on the social media network Gettr. A spokesperson for Bannon also declined to comment.

The misinformation about Konnech has helped feed online harassment and threats against Konnech’s CEO and his family, Goldberg said.

“Might want to book flights back to Wuhan before we hang you until dead!” reads one email to the CEO cited in the company’s lawsuit.

Another aspect of Konnech’s decision to go to court, Goldberg said, involved the importance of maintaining faith in U.S. elections.

“They are facing a group that, through its own actions and by spreading falsehoods and misinformation, [is] essentially targeting the election process,” said Goldberg.

That sentiment appeared to be echoed in the restraining order handed down in Konnech’s defamation case.

Federal Judge Kenneth Hoyt wrote in his order that the evidence presented by Konnech showed that a restraining order “would in fact benefit the public’s expectation of integrity in the U.S. election process.”