“Doesn’t my boy or girl get to come to a decision exactly where she life? She is 13.”
Any parent who is in the center of a little one custody dispute finds them selves inquiring this query. In making a conclusion about youngster custody, Michigan legislation demands that the court docket think about and ascertain custody after wanting at the 12 very best interest components established forth in MCL 722.23.
Little one Preference in Custody Disputes
Under Michigan regulation, a little one does not lawfully get to determine in which she life right up until she is 18. The sensible preference of a little one is only 1 variable of the 12 very best interest things. Although the court’s investigation does not have to have that every factor be supplied equivalent pounds, the bodyweight to be presented to any element is in the court’s discretion. Riemer v. Johnson, 311 Mich App, 632, 876 NW2d 279 (2015). If the problem of child custody is brought just before the courtroom in an evidentiary hearing or trial, the court interviews the baby privately, outside the house of the courtroom to secure the child from the trauma of picking between the parents in open up court docket. Impullitti v.Impullitti, 163 Mich Application 507, 415 NW2d 261 (1987). Furthermore, the courtroom is not to include any other issues other than the child’s desire through the job interview. In point, the Michigan Court docket of Appeals has held that reversible mistake may come about if the courtroom uses details for the duration of the interview about which father or mother took the baby to the health practitioner, cooked meals, cleaned or aided with homework when figuring out the most effective fascination of the youngster. Thompson v. Thompson, 261 Mich Application 353, 364-65, 683 NW2d 250 (2004).
The job interview by itself is not demanded to be recorded, although numerous judges do record the interview to preserve the file for the attractiveness. The personal job interview is restricted to what the boy or girl likes or dislikes about each parent’s house, and how the child would established matters up if she was in cost. The courtroom is not required to disclose the child’s desire, and the child’s choice is only one particular component utilized to make the court’s decision. There are distinctive developmental issues depending on a child’s age, and when there is no rule that a teenager’s choice ought to be specified wonderful bodyweight, the teenage child’s desire might have far more influence than the preference of a younger boy or girl. In conclusion, a baby does not get to come to a decision which mother or father to live with in any baby custody issue. However, the child’s preference is a person variable for the court to get into account in making its conclusion.
The pandemic adjusted society in a number of ways, but in phrases of our working life, the biggest impression of COVID was the ubiquity of working from dwelling. That ushered in a quantity of other tendencies the media was swift to decide up on, namely silent quitting — that is, the practice of executing the bare minimum at work and not overextending oneself on behalf of their employers, and surreptitiously doing the job many job remotely.
Now both equally all those techniques may possibly have their day in courtroom.
Yesterday, New York-centered litigation business Napoli Shkolnik sued just one of its attorneys, Heather Palmore and her legislation business The Palmore Team P.C., for several counts including breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty of loyalty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty of loyalty, injurious falsehood, unjust enrichment, declaratory judgment, and constructive have confidence in.
[Update: Palmore has now filed her own lawsuit, alleging discrimination and retaliation by Napoli Shoknik.]
In accordance to the criticism, Palmore peaceful quit her occupation at the plaintiffs regulation agency though she labored at her have follow:
In the pursuit of private pecuniary gain, Defendant Palmore misrepresented her skillset, practical experience, and ebook of enterprise to get hold of a situation with Napoli Shkolnik, exactly where she took advantage of the new remote perform atmosphere to “quiet quit” her job, and simultaneously worked for two regulation companies at after, the two Plaintiff and the Defendant Palmore Legislation Group, in violation of her Employment Settlement and New York regulation.
The grievance alleges the defendant’s regulation organization operated in competitors with her employer:
Ms. Palmore wrongfully joined both of those tendencies [quiet quitting and working multiple jobs remotely], amassing a just one of the most sizeable attracts in the complete company from Napoli Shkolnik, even though performing minor to no get the job done for Napoli Shkolnik, and although straight competing with the firm by concurrently running Defendant Palmore Regulation Team, P.C. These steps were being in direct violation of her employment agreement, in breach of her fiduciary duty of loyalty to Napoli Shkolnik and intended to enrich herself at Napoli Shkolnik’s cost.
The criticism goes on to allege that Palmore’s timesheets were also fabrications unsupported by the authorized do the job the defendant completed:
As established forth herein, pc information display that Ms. Palmore has been active on her pc for mere minutes a day on the frustrating majority of workdays in 2023, in spite of publishing everyday time data falsely symbolizing that she put in hrs carrying out lawful study and drafting and “outlining” paperwork. …. In stunning style, in some occasions Palmore fabricated and submitted blatantly untrue day by day time information representing that she experienced presently concluded a entire day’s operate just before small business hrs.
Further, the grievance accuses Palmore making an attempt “to extort money from the firm by building untrue and defamatory claims of discrimination directed to ‘others’ devoid of any factual basis” as soon as her “scheme” was identified.
“Napoli Shkolnik filed this entirely bogus preemptive lawsuit only right after Ms. Palmore raised significant statements of discrimination from the agency and was getting ready to file her very own motion.” Gottlieb claimed. “This preemptive lawsuit is a transparent and unwell-suggested try to check out to acquire some perceived strategic gain, but it is certainly an act of blatant retaliation. We will be shifting ahead with Ms. Palmore’s lawsuit in brief buy, which will involve claims centered on this retaliatory carry out.”
Whilst Lucas Markowitz of Offit Kurman, lawyer for Napoli Shkolnik, said of the suit, “As we condition in our papers, Ms. Palmore misrepresented her skillset, expertise and e-book of organization to acquire a posture with Napoli Shkolnik. She then directly competed with Napoli Shkolnik by primary her individual law agency. When Napoli Shkolnik commenced to uncover these misrepresentations, Ms. Palmore defamed the agency in an attempt to extort further cash.”
Study the total grievance down below:
2. Grievance
Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Over the Regulation, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Pondering Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the ideal, so make sure you link with her. Feel absolutely free to electronic mail her with any strategies, issues, or responses and stick to her on Twitter @Kathryn1 or Mastodon @[email protected].
PASADENA, CALIFORNIA, UNITED STATES, February 27, 2023 /EINPresswire.com/ — Burbank household law lawyer and mediator Jami Fosgate will be showcased in Pasadena Magazine’s record of 2023 Top Lawyers in the Pasadena region in the publication’s March 2023 challenge.
“I am so honored to be incorporated in Pasadena Magazine’s list of 2023 Top Lawyers,” Jami Fosgate reported. “I want to lengthen my congratulations to the lots of fantastic Pasadena location lawyers who were also acknowledged.”
Jami Fosgate is a compassionate legal professional and mediator who will help consumers solve their circumstances in a well timed and price-successful fashion while reducing psychological anxiety. She thinks that by means of mediation and collaborative practice, spouses will be far better geared up to co-mum or dad and perform together to solve any future conflicts.
Fosgate Relatives Regulation & Mediation Center specializes in Collaborative Divorce, divorce mediation, little one custody, spousal aid, parenting options, property division, pre-marital agreements and authorized document preparation. The firm promotes Collaborative Divorce as a much better way to untie the knot as a result of its membership in the International Academy of Collaborative Pros (IACP), the Los Angeles Collaborative Family Law Affiliation (LACFLA), Pasadena Collaborative Divorce, Virtual Divorce California and Household Divorce Answers of San Fernando Valley.
Pasadena Journal is a bi-every month way of living publication masking the folks, institutions and enterprises of Pasadena and the encompassing San Gabriel Valley. Aspect of the Engine Eyesight Media loved ones of journals, which incorporates Los Angeles and Orange Coast, the journal incorporates protection of the food items, arts, lifestyle, genuine estate, style and leisure that would make Pasadena and the surrounding place so uniquely enjoyable. Go to pasadenamag.com for more information and facts and to uncover the Top rated Legal professionals list.
For much more information and facts about Jami Fosgate’s spouse and children regulation services or to routine a divorce consultation, take a look at familylawattorney-burbank.com or get in touch with (818) 827-7157. Couples can get a just one-hour informational session at no demand when they attend the appointment alongside one another.
England’s most senior family court judge has advised there is a “need for rigour” and “clarity” when instructing psychologists to give expert evidence – but has stopped short of saying the family courts should never appoint those who are “unregulated”.
Instead Sir Andrew McFarlane claims it is a matter for the psychological profession, and ultimately parliament, whether a “tighter regime should be imposed” on what he has described as a “confusing system”.
The president of the family division in England and Wales made the comments in a landmark judgment published on Wednesday that confirms the generic label “psychologist” is not protected and “can be used by anyone”.
His conclusions follow intense debate and various guidance over the years about the the definition of a psychologist and who can use that term when assisting the court.
Psychologists can be appointed in cases where judges are making life-changing decisions about children such as placing them in care, transferring residence between parents in conflict or deciding where they should live after allegations of abuse
The judgment follows an appeal by a mother who was seeking a re-hearing of her case after her children were removed from her care. She claimed the jointly instructed expert on “parental alienation” who assessed her family was neither regulated nor appropriately qualified.
Judge Lindsay Davies ordered that the children should live with their father – against their wishes – after accepting Melanie Gill’s findings that the mother had “alienated” them from him. She stressed that she also considered other evidence, including the mother’s own evidence, before making the order.
The appeal was opposed by the father and the children’s guardian but was supported by the Association of Clinical Psychologists (ACP-UK) as an intervenor along with Gill.
Representing the professional body, Barbara Mills KC submitted that Gill’s instruction was a “stark and troubling example of an individual who holds herself out as an expert but has neither the qualifications nor the relevant skills so to hold”.
Andrew Bagchi KC rejected the criticisms of Gill, claiming she was an expert and that the burden was not on her to prove her qualifications. He said she made clear at the outset what the scope of her work would entail.
Mills argued that, in the absence of regulation, the onus was on Gill to satisfy the court she was properly qualified.
But McFarlane rejected the appeal during a public hearing in December. The judgment lays out his reasons and addresses the wider issue of experts.
He wrote: “From the perspective of the court, and it may be from a wider public perspective, the open-house nature of the term ‘psychologist’ is unhelpful and potentially confusing.
“In other fields, particularly medicine, the court is used to a stricter regulatory scheme in which an individual can only call themselves a professional title … if recognition of their expert status is confirmed and monitored through formal regulation and registration.
“It is, however, a matter for the psychological profession and, ultimately, parliament, whether a tighter regime should be imposed.”
President of the Family Division Sir Andrew McFarlane. Photograph: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary/PA
The only psychologists subject to statutory regulation in the UK are those registered with the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC) who hold one of seven protected titles such as “clinical psychologist”.
But the generic label “psychologist” is not protected and can be used by anyone, whether registered or not. A report by an unregistered person calling themselves a psychologist may be called a “psychological report”.
McFarlane writes: “The court must therefore work with the current, potentially confusing scheme, but must do so with its eyes wide open to the need for clarity over the expertise of those who present as a psychologist, but who are neither registered nor chartered.”
He goes on: “A lesson plainly to be drawn from the present case is the need for clarity as to an expert’s qualification and/or experience.”
Earlier in the judgment, it was noted that Gill had been selected by the children’s guardian and put forward erroneously as “Dr Gill”. Her CV was a “diffuse and confusing narrative,” wrote McFarlane, adding: “It would have been hard for the court and the parties to drill down to see what her underlying qualifications were.”
Registration with the HCPC or charted status with the British Psychological Society provides a “reliable one-stop method of authentication”, he said.
“It is not, however, for this court to prohibit the instruction of any unregulated psychologist,” he added. He said the matter of whether an expert is “qualified to give expert evidence” is down to the individual judge in each case.
Where an expert is unregistered, the court should indicate in a short judgment why it is appropriate to instruct them, McFarlane advises.
“Given the potentially confusing use of the title ‘psychologist’, the need for due rigour is underscored,” the president wrote.
Turning to the use of the label ‘parental alienation’, MacFarlane said he strongly urged that the ACP-UK’s view – that the term is not a syndrome capable of being diagnosed – is accepted.
Instead, according to the organisation, the process of the manipulation of children – perpetrated by one parent against the other through, what are termed, as ‘alienating behaviours’ – is “fundamentally a question of fact”.
McFarlane wrote: “Most family judges have, for some time, regarded the label of ‘parental alienation’ and the suggestion there may be a diagnosable syndrome of that name, as being unhelpful.
“What is important, as with domestic abuse, is the particular behaviour found to have taken place…and the impact that behaviour may have had on the relationship of a child with either or both of his/her parents.
“In this regard, the identification of ‘alienating behaviour’ should be the court’s focus, rather than any quest to determine whether the label ‘parental alienation’ can be applied.”
Is quiet quitting leading to public termination? (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP by way of Getty Visuals)
A New York legal professional is becoming sued by her employer for “quiet quitting,” a term for workers who do not depart their occupation but do the bare least and in its place emphasis their time on external routines.
Napoli Shkolnik, a New York-centered own injury law business yesterday (Feb. 23) filed a lawsuit against Heather Palmore, an lawyer who is even now utilized at the business. Palmore is accused of having “advantage of the new remote function ecosystem to ‘quiet quit’ her position,” in accordance to the criticism.
The regulation company claims that Palmore’s personal computer documents display she only spent a few minutes a working day on her computer throughout the bulk of 2023. The lawyer, who was to start with hired in Oct 2021, on top of that submitted falsified everyday reviews that stated she invested hrs on legal study and drafting documents, including just one stating she had labored 7 several hours in the foreseeable future, reported the grievance.
In the past 5 months, Palmore has also allegedly refused to arrive into perform, get approval for time off or give any updates on her scenarios. Napoli Shkolnik claimed further more evidence of Palmore’s “quiet quitting” features a medical malpractice circumstance she worked on in November 2021 exactly where she gave an 8-moment prolonged opening statement, “when regular opening statements in plaintiff health care malpractice conditions are roughly a person to two hrs extensive,” in accordance to court docket filings.
The lawsuit focuses on two new office tendencies
The firm is moreover accusing Palmore of operating her possess legislation business even though working for Napoli Shkolnik, hence collaborating in an additional workplace development of workers secretly doing work numerous employment.
“Ms. Palmore wrongfully joined the two developments, gathering a person of the most considerable attracts in the complete agency from Napoli Shkolnik, though undertaking very little to no function for Napoli Shkolnik, and though right competing with the business by simultaneously functioning Defendant Palmore Regulation Group,” reads the grievance.
The legislation company alleged Palmore breached her employee contract and fiduciary obligation of loyalty, and is seeking to strike her compensation during the “period of disloyalty/breach of agreement,” which exceeds $400,000.
In accordance to Lucas Markowitz, a law firm representing Napoli Shkolnik, Palmore started defaming the agency right after it uncovered her behavior in an try to extort also income.
Even so, David Gottlieb, an legal professional representing Palmore, mentioned Napoli Shkolnik’s lawsuit was only submitted in reaction to claims of discrimination Palmore has lifted against the company and an upcoming motion she has been arranging to file.
“This preemptive lawsuit is a transparent and unwell-recommended attempt to try out to get some perceived strategic edge, but is clearly an act of blatant retaliation,” claimed Gottlieb in an emailed assertion. “We will be relocating ahead with Ms. Palmore’s lawsuit in quick get, which will include claims based mostly on this retaliatory carry out.”
Five years ago — Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis first campaigned for governor touting a hard line on immigration.
On the radar— When he picked Jeanette Nuñez as his lieutenant governor back in 2018, the question even back then was whether DeSantis would target one of her big legislative wins: a law that guaranteed in-state tuition rates for undocumented children of migrants if they had attended a Florida high school for three years. It was a measure that was opposed by some Republicans at the time but passed after a strong push by both then-House Speaker Will Weatherford and then-Gov. Rick Scott.
Sidestepped— During his first term, DeSantis offered up other immigration proposals but didn’t touch the in-state tuition measure for those known as Dreamers. That changed on Thursday.
Border politics— Taking aim at President Joe Biden over the border, DeSantis rolled out new immigration proposals ahead of his expected presidential run (which is not a question of if, but when) that included repealing the in-state tuition measure. “If we want to hold the line on tuition, then you have got to say ‘you need to be a U.S. citizen living in Florida,’” DeSantis said.
And more— He also said he wants to repeal separate law passed by the GOP-controlled Legislature that allows noncitizens to be admitted to the Florida Bar. And DeSantis called for expanding the use of “E-Verify” to all private employers, broadening a law he himself signed but now labels as “inadequate.”
Familiar names— Many Republicans who voted for the in-state tuition bill while they were in the Legislature are still around. There’s not only Nuñez, but Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis, Education Commissioner Manny Diaz and Agriculture Commissioner Wilton Simpson. Their response? Silence.
Holding firm— But Scott was not. Scott criticized Biden’s handling of immigration but then called it “unfair” to deny in-state tuition rates for someone who was brought illegally into the country at a young age. “They didn’t come here on their own volition,” Scott told reporters during a stop in Tampa. “It’s a bill that I was proud to sign. … It’s a bill I would sign again today.”
Change is constant— Of course, it should be noted that Scott himself touted his own hard line on immigration when he first ran in 2010 but then supported the in-state tuition measure when he was up for reelection four years ago. DeSantis himself could have recommended repealing the measure during his first term but waited until now. Timing, timing, timing.
— WHERE’S RON? — Nothing official announced for Gov. DeSantis.
Have a tip, story, suggestion, birthday, anniversary, new job, or any other nugget for Playbook? Get in touch: [email protected]
REPEALER TIME— DeSantis blasts immigration laws once popular with Florida Republicans, by POLITICO’s Matt Dixon: Gov. Ron DeSantis is using his sway over the Republican-dominated Legislature to urge lawmakers to repeal state laws that offered additional legal rights to undocumented immigrants, protections that less than a decade ago were popular with many Florida Republicans, including DeSantis’ own lieutenant governor. The new proposals were outlined in an immigration package DeSantis unveiled Thursday during a Jacksonville press conference.
OPPOSITION — “Pritzker will do what it takes to keep both DeSantis and Trump out of the White House,” by Bloomberg’s Laura Davidson and Shruti Singh: “Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker said he’s willing to spend what it takes in the next election to help President Joe Biden keep his job — and keep Republicans like Ron DeSantis and Donald Trump out of the White House. ‘It’s very important to me that we elect a Democratic president and that we make sure to keep DeSantis, Trump and the retrograde views that they carry out of the White House,’ Pritzker, a longtime Democratic donor, said in an interview Thursday with Bloomberg News in Chicago.”
THAT DIDN’T TAKE LONG— “Uproar over proposed law to ban driving with dogs leaning out of car windows. ‘This is not something that Floridians want,’” by South Florida Sun-Sentinel’s Anthony Man: “A proposed ban on people driving with their dogs’ heads outside car windows drew a swift backlash within days of its introduction, and the sponsor now plans to remove, or significantly change, that provision in comprehensive animal-welfare legislation. ‘The public has spoken. She’s heard from folks who feel really strongly about this. This is not something that Floridians want,’ said Claire VanSusteren, spokeswoman for Senate Democratic Leader Lauren Book.”
FOLLOWING THE MONEY — “Estimates vary widely on cost to expand school vouchers in Florida,” by Tampa Bay Times’ Jeffrey S. Solochek: “Florida lawmakers have been given two wildly different cost estimates as they consider a bill that would expand school vouchers and offer education savings accounts to all school-aged children in the state. The bill’s sponsor, State Rep. Kaylee Tuck, R-Lake Placid, put the number at $209.6 million Thursday as the Florida House took its first look at the bill’s price tag. But the independent Florida Policy Institute says the measure could add billions to the state budget.”
THE AGENDA — “Florida bill would end diversity programs, ban majors, shift power at universities,” by Tampa Bay Times’ Divya Kumar: “A bill filed this week in the Florida House would turn many of Gov. Ron DeSantis’ wide-ranging ideas on higher education into law by limiting diversity efforts, vastly expanding the powers of university boards and altering course offerings. House Bill 999, filed by Rep. Alex Andrade, R-Pensacola, proposes leaving all faculty hiring to boards of trustees, allowing a faculty member’s tenure to be reviewed ‘at any time,’ and removing majors or minors in subjects like critical race theory and gender studies. It would also prohibit spending on activities that promote diversity, equity and inclusion and create new general education requirements.”
R.I.P.— “Tom Pelham, the last secretary of the now-abolished Florida Department of Community Affairs, dies at age 79,” by WFSU’s Tom Flanigan: “The man who twice served as the State of Florida’s top growth manager has died. Tom Pelham headed up the Department of Community Affairs twice before the Legislature abolished it in 2011. Pelham became the Department’s Secretary just 2 years after the Legislature created the agency in 1985 to oversee regional and risky location developments. And right after his appointment by Governor Bob Martinez, he recalled a visit from a group of statewide developers. In an interview with WFSU last year, he said they wanted the green light to build big retail centers around every Turnipike and interstate highway interchange in the state.”
RECALIBRATION — “Trump’s grip on the Republican base is slipping — even among his fans,” by Washington Post’s Isaac Arnsdorf, Josh Dawsey, Hannah Knowles, Yvonne Wingett Sanchez, Patrick Marley and Ashley Parker: “In its place, a new dynamic emerged from interviews with more than 150 Trump supporters across five pivotal electoral states. In between Republicans who remain firmly committed or opposed to the former president, there’s now a broad range of [former President Donald] Trump supporters who, however much they still like him, aren’t sure they want him as the party’s next nominee.”
Why? — “The foremost reason is electability. Even Republicans who said they still supported Trump and believed his false claims that the 2020 election was stolen acknowledged doubts on whether he could defeat President Biden or another Democrat in 2024. “They’ve put so much doubt and mistrust in the people’s minds that he might have a hard time winning,” said Mark Goodman, a retired FedEx driver who lives in Chattahoochee Hills, Ga., and remains a staunch supporter.”
— Trump-allied group wants J6 committee staffers backlisted, by POLITICO’s Hailey Fuchs and Kyle Cheney
THE FINAL COUNTDOWN — Two days before Florida Democrats select a new leader, the two prime contenders for the job continued to roll out endorsements. Former Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried announced on Thursday the backing of members of the Democratic Executive Committee from seven more counties, while former state Sen. Annette Taddeo said she had picked up endorsements from DEC members from five counties, including Orange. One unofficial tally compiled by a former Florida Democratic Party official has Fried with 521 votes, Taddeo with 365 votes and 38 for other candidates. It takes nearly 600 votes to win.
CALLED OUT — “White House accuses Florida Republicans of ‘inaction’ after fatal shooting of reporter,” by McClatchy D.C.’s Michael Wilner: “‘Too many lives are being ripped apart by gun violence,’ White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters at the start of a White House briefing on Thursday. ‘The president continues to call on Congress to act on gun safety, and for state officials to take action at the state level. But instead of following in the footsteps of so many other states taking common sense action to enact state-level assault weapons bans, and other gun safety measures, Republican state officials in Florida are currently leading an effort to pass a permitless concealed-carry law, which would eliminate the need to get a license to carry a concealed weapon,’ she continued. ‘This is the opposite of common sense gun safety and the people of Florida, who have paid a steep price for state and congressional inaction on guns — from Parkland to Pulse nightclub to Pine Hills — deserve better.’”
THE FLORIDA CONNECTION — “George Santos’ Miami boosters: Anti-vax school leaders, billionaire lawyer’s family,” by Miami Herald’s Aaron Leibowitz: “Now they say they were just as naive as the American public was about [Rep. George] Santos’ background. Since his November election, media reports have revealed that much of his life story appeared to be a farce — including that his mother escaped the 9/11 terrorist attacks and that he attended New York’s Baruch College and starred on the volleyball team. “Every person in America was duped by George Santos, including us,” David Centner told the Miami Herald in a statement.”
FIRST EXECUTION SINCE 2019 — “Florida executes man for 1990 murder while a fugitive,” by The Associated Press’ Brendan Farrington: “Florida executed a man on Thursday for murdering a woman in 1990 after he escaped from prison, stabbing her to death in a shopping mall parking lot in an attempted carjacking. Donald Dillbeck, 59, was pronounced dead at 6:13 p.m. after receiving a lethal injection, the governor’s office said. He had been convicted in the murder of Faye Vann, 44, in Tallahassee near the state Capitol. The execution was Florida’s first in nearly four years and the third under Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis. By comparison, his immediate predecessor, current U.S. Republican Sen. Rick Scott, oversaw 28 executions.”
TO COURT — “Lawsuit accuses New College and trustee Christopher Rufo of violating public records law,” by Sarasota Herald-Tribune’s Zac Anderson: “A nonprofit group focused on government accountability is alleging in a lawsuit filed Tuesday that New College of Florida and new trustee Christoper Rufo have withheld public records in violation of state law. Sarasota attorney Andrea Mogensen filed the lawsuit in the 12th Judicial Circuit on behalf of the Florida Center for Government Accountability, which requested text messages and logs of all texts and phone calls made by Rufo between Jan. 6, when Gov. Ron DeSantis appointed him to the New College board, and Jan. 23.”
— “Deltona censures commissioner over derogatory Facebook comment directed at resident,” by The Daytona Beach News-Journal’s Katie Kustura: “Though the commission is limited in actions it can take against one of its own, Mayor Santiago Avila Jr. said he wanted the record to reflect the commission didn’t support the comment. During public comment at Monday’s meeting, more than a dozen residents, some of whom said they don’t personally know [Nick] Lulli, addressed [Commissioner Tom] Burbank’s post, which many found, among other things, homophobic. The overall message conveyed was that Burbank’s comments were not prudent and were not becoming of an elected official.”
BIRTHDAYS: Susan K. Goldstein with The Legis Group … Bud Chiles, national director American Grown
(Saturday) Rep. Darren Soto … Carlos Trujillo, former U.S. ambassador to the Organization of American States … Public Service Commissioner Mike La Rosa … POLITICO’s Matt Dixon …
(Sunday)State Rep. David Silvers … Ana Cruz of Ballard Partners … Former state Rep. Ron Greenstein … Former state Rep. Jerry Paul … Jason Dearen, investigative reporter … Photographer Mark Foley
The pandemic adjusted society in a number of ways, but in phrases of our working life, the biggest impression of COVID was the ubiquity of working from dwelling. That ushered in a quantity of other tendencies the media was swift to decide up on, namely silent quitting — that is, the practice of executing the bare minimum at work and not overextending oneself on behalf of their employers, and surreptitiously doing the job many job remotely.
Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Over the Regulation, host of 
