Throughout the closing arguments in a $10 million malpractice trial, attorney Robert McKenna III explained to jurors the statements against his customer, a gastroenterologist, were being baseless and equal to “extortion.” The patient’s loved ones blamed the gastroenterologist for their father’s loss of life, alleging the medical professional perforated his colon all through insertion of a feeding tube.  “I acquire pleasure in what I do, and I’ve acquired to notify you, in the 30 decades I have been carrying out this, I have under no circumstances viewed a more insulting, factually devoid presentation in my full career,” McKenna reported, according to court transcripts. “On the strength of this proof, they…