Documents raise questions about man’s claims : NPR

Documents raise questions about man’s claims : NPR

A Texas man says three women helped his now-ex-wife obtain pills for an abortion last year “without his knowledge,” and he’s suing them for $1 million each.

The wrongful death lawsuit, believed to be the first of its kind since the U.S. Supreme Court curtailed abortion rights last summer, highlights concerns about digital privacy and reproductive health. And it comes as a battle over the future of access to medication abortion plays out in the federal court system.

And now, experts say a close analysis of documents related to the case appears to undercut some of the man’s claims.

Pages of ‘janky’ text messages

Marcus Silva says that last July – just weeks after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade – three women helped his then-wife secretly get abortion pills and illegally end her pregnancy.

Silva and his lawyers have claimed repeatedly that his then-wife took the pills behind his back.

“There is a very strong issue here, that a man had a child; he did not know about it, and the child was killed,” one of Silva’s attorneys, Peter Breen, told NPR after the lawsuit was filed in March. “So his fatherhood of that child was terminated without even his knowledge.”

Silva’s legal team declined to comment for this story.

Experts say the text messages included in the lawsuit appear to have been directly photographed by a second device. In some, a thumb or finger appears visible on the right side.

from a lawsuit filed in Galveston County, Texas


hide caption

toggle caption

from a lawsuit filed in Galveston County, Texas

Text messages included as exhibits in Marcus Silva’s lawsuit may offer clues about when they were captured.

from a lawsuit filed in Galveston County, Texas


hide caption

toggle caption

from a lawsuit filed in Galveston County, Texas

Silva made a similar claim in his lawsuit, which was filed in Galveston County, Texas, a few weeks after the couple’s divorce was finalized. In the suit, Silva says he “recently learned of the defendants’ involvement” and that his ex “decided to kill the unborn child without Marcus’ knowledge or consent.”

But several forensic and legal experts interviewed by NPR say key documents related to the case suggest that Silva may have known his wife was planning an abortion before it took place by accessing her text messages. The messages, in which the woman shares intimate details with her friends, are included as exhibits in the lawsuit.

Lana Ramjit, director of operations at the Clinic to End Tech Abuse at Cornell, which works to prevent technology-based stalking and abuse, says it’s hard to know exactly when or how most of the messages were captured or who captured them. But there are some clues, she says, including a glare on the screen and what looks like a thumb, suggesting someone used another device to take pictures of the messages.

“They are pretty clearly photos of a phone,” Ramjit says, describing the photos as “janky,” noting the lopsided framing or cropping apparent in some of them.

Ramjit pointed to one message in particular, with a timestamp reading, “Today, 6:38 p.m.,” which she says suggests someone photographed the message soon after it was sent. It comes at the end of a long exchange where the women appear to be talking about the need to hide both the pregnancy and the abortion from Silva.

“So we know those photos were taken the same day as the message,” Ramjit says.

A note, a pill and a police report

A police report taken July 18, 2022, in League City, Texas, details a complaint from Marcus Silva about materials he said he found in his then-wife’s purse nearly a week earlier. Personally identifying information has been redacted.

NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

NPR

Silva’s lawyers have declined to say how he got access to the text messages. But a new document obtained by NPR may shed some light on that question.

A police report from League City, Texas, dated July 18, 2022, states Marcus Silva told officers that six days earlier, he found a Post-It note in his then-wife’s purse with the phone number for an abortion clinic.

Silva said he went through her phone and “saw text messages between his wife and several other people” planning the abortion. The next day, July 13, Silva said he went through her purse again and found a white pill with the letters “M-F.” He searched online, according to the report, and concluded it was the first pill used in the medication abortion process. In other words, mifepristone.

Silva also said he was “upset that she did not at least have this conversation with him,” according to the police report.

Other police documents obtained by NPR suggest a pattern of ongoing tension between the couple. In one incident earlier this year, Silva’s ex-wife called police to complain that Marcus was threatening to come to her home with the police to collect belongings she said he thought he should have received in their divorce.

League City police say after Silva’s report last July, they determined that there was not enough evidence to pursue any further action.

Authorities in Galveston County also say they have no plans to press criminal charges related to Silva’s abortion lawsuit.

Considerations for a potential jury

It’s not clear when exactly the abortion took place; the lawsuit says only that it happened sometime in July 2022.

But if Silva knew about the abortion ahead of time, as the police report seems to suggest, that could undermine his argument that he should be awarded damages, according to Mike Golden, director of advocacy at the University of Texas School of Law.

“If the jury comes to the conclusion that he knew full well that this was going on and did nothing about it, that strongly suggests that he suffered little to no emotional distress as a result of this happening,” Golden says.

Even if Silva obtained the messages without his wife’s consent, Golden and other legal experts interviewed by NPR say it’s very likely they are admissible in court under rules for civil lawsuits in Texas. But Golden adds that it’s another factor a jury might consider unfavorably.

Virtual, but not hypothetical, risk

Whatever the outcome of this case, the fact that the women’s text messages are part of it underscores how digital communication can make people legally vulnerable, said Chinmayi Sharma, a lecturer at the University of Texas at Austin School of Law and scholar in residence at UT Austin’s Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law.

“I think there should be awareness of how big of a risk this is, and how much it’s not just hypothetical — it is absolutely happening,” Sharma said.

Sharma noted that in one exchange, Silva’s ex-wife appears to share her ovulation calendar with her friends, “which is another thing that is a big concern if you’re in a state where the timing of the abortion is relevant.”

Silva isn’t suing his ex-wife because Texas law contains exemptions for people who terminate their own pregnancies. But others can be targeted for helping someone get an abortion.

Rusty Hardin, a Houston-based defense attorney, is representing two of the three defendants. He says it’s unfortunate that his clients have been caught up in this case for trying to help a friend.

“It just shows that these are not simple matters. These are family and personal women’s issues. They are not the business of the rest of the world, quite frankly,” Hardin said.

A fundraising email from Peter Breen and the Thomas More Society dated March 28 highlights the Silva lawsuit.

Thomas More Society email


hide caption

toggle caption

Thomas More Society email


A fundraising email from Peter Breen and the Thomas More Society dated March 28 highlights the Silva lawsuit.

Thomas More Society email

Silva’s lawyer, Breen, has said the lawsuit’s goal is to establish that anyone who assists with an abortion in states like Texas where it’s now illegal could face civil liability — or even, he hopes, criminal prosecution.

In a recent fundraising message emailed to supporters of his conservative Catholic group, the Thomas More Society, Breen tells readers the lawsuit targets women who helped Silva’s former wife get an abortion “behind Marcus’ back.” It also describes the lawsuit as “groundbreaking.”

The message asks readers to send their prayers — and their donations.

Calls Between Hennepin County Attorney, Sheriff raise questions about Sheriff’s medical leave

Calls Between Hennepin County Attorney, Sheriff raise questions about Sheriff’s medical leave

The day right before Hennepin County Sheriff Dave Hutchinson went on voluntary health care depart May well 18, he experienced a 10 a.m. mobile phone simply call with Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman.   

It adopted one more morning cellphone simply call in between the two guys 5 days previously on May well 12.   

Sources close to Hutchinson stated Freeman’s counsel played a pivotal position in the sheriff’s conclusion to go on healthcare leave.   

At the time, Hutchinson was not only experiencing the fallout from his drunk driving crash six months earlier, but also a new county investigation into no matter if he experienced established a hostile work natural environment in the sheriff’s office environment.   

The FOX 9 Investigators acquired about the two cellular phone calls from a general public information ask for for Freeman’s operate calendar. Freeman’s calendar reveals no other phone calls or appointments involving the two guys in the previous six months.   

Telephone connect with data amongst Hutchinson and Freeman. (FOX 9)

Freeman has declined to solution issues about the nature of his counsel to the disgraced sheriff, and his precise position in people discussions.   

“I think all my conversations on this subject are inside the scope of legal professional customer privilege and appropriately just can’t comment,” Freeman wrote in a June 22 e mail immediately after FOX 9 sought clarification of his role.     

In a abide by-up e mail, FOX 9 requested Freeman who precisely his customer was: Sheriff Hutchinson, Hennepin County Administration, or both equally?    

FOX 9 also questioned Freeman if he has served as a ‘sponsor’ for Hutchinson in Alcoholics Anonymous or any other sort of restoration from substance abuse.   

This kind of a function may present a conflict of fascination for the veteran prosecutor, who did not find a different time period. 

Freeman wrote back again on June 23, “I serve underneath statute as the lawyer for the Sheriff’s business office and the Sheriff. Accordingly, all a few of your new questions established forth under, stay inside of the scope of my illustration of my client the Sheriff and his office.” 

“With regard to troubles of own advice or sponsorship, they as well are private conversations which I am not at liberty to disclose,” Freeman wrote.   

Via a spokesperson, Freeman was offered an possibility very last week to clarify his remarks but did not respond. 

The two top rated law enforcement officers in Hennepin County have some factors in prevalent. Both equally males have reportedly sought counseling for compound abuse, and both are accused of generating a hostile function natural environment.   

On Thursday, the Hennepin County Board voted to censure Hutchinson for “behaving in a hostile and retaliatory manner toward Sheriff’s Place of work personnel.”  The FOX 9 Investigators reported in July that Hutchinson’s senior command staff members complained about a hostile function natural environment and racist text messages. 

Coincidentally, the censure comes a yr to the day following Hutchinson got into a drunk driving crash whilst returning from a law enforcement meeting in Alexandria.  

Freeman admitted to a problem with alcoholic beverages in Might 2019 and sought cure, returning to perform 4 months later on.  

Freeman was accused by just one of his top prosecutors, Amy Sweasy, of making a hostile do the job environment. Hennepin County settled the circumstance in May for $190,000.   

Sweasy no more time stories immediately to Freeman, but past thirty day period she filed a lawsuit expressing Freeman is however retaliating against her and violating the phrases of a settlement settlement.

FOX 9’s preliminary request for Freeman’s function calendar was denied, right until FOX 9 available prior administrative court rulings that reported this sort of data could be fairly redacted. 

Freeman’s calendar for Thursday, Might 12, lists a 10 a.m.-11 a.m. “Phone Connect with W/ HUTCHINSON.”  It is adopted by a conference that is redacted.   

Freeman’s calendar for Tuesday, May perhaps 17, lists a 10 a.m.-11 a.m. “Cellular phone Get in touch with W/ SHERIFF HUTCHINSON.”  That entry is preceded by a conference that has also been redacted.   

The calendar records presented last thirty day period have extra than 200 redactions.