Independence lawyer tied to utility projects that drew FBI scrutiny indicted for tax evasion | KCUR 89.3

Independence lawyer tied to utility projects that drew FBI scrutiny indicted for tax evasion | KCUR 89.3

An legal professional and former elected formal in Independence was indicted Tuesday by a federal grand jury on felonies similar to tax evasion.

John C. Carnes, 67, was charged with a person rely of tax evasion, just one count of corruptly endeavoring to impede the IRS and 7 counts of failure to spend taxes. He appeared in the Western District of Missouri Kansas Town Wednesday and was released on bond.

Carnes is a former member of the Jackson County Legislature and Independence Town Council who served two years in prison just after being convicted in 1989 of financial institution fraud and bribing an additional council member. His law license was reinstated in 2006.

Much more a short while ago, Carnes was associated in two Independence utility initiatives that have confronted a long time of FBI scrutiny — the city’s determination to invest in the former Rockwood Golfing System to build a solar farm and the deal to demolish the city-owned electrical power plant in Missouri Metropolis.

In accordance to the indictment, Carnes allegedly averted shelling out taxes involving 2012 and 2018 and attempted to hide his tax legal responsibility by shifting money into attorney rely on accounts, which are meant to be for cash that are in a lawyer’s possession in link with symbolizing a consumer. He allegedly owes approximately $345,000 in back taxes

Federal prosecutors say Carnes deposited $232,000 into legal professional believe in accounts that came from charges for solutions associated to the sale of the Rockwood Golfing System and the demolition of the Missouri Metropolis Electricity Plant.

The legal professional have confidence in accounts were being used, the indictment alleges, to protect against the IRS from collecting cash Carnes owed on income taxes.

Carnes is also alleged to have withdrawn income from attorney belief accounts to fund his personal and organization bills, which include at Kansas Town-place casinos. He also obtained income from consumers that he did not deposit into his financial institution accounts.

In an job interview Wednesday with the Kansas City Star, Carnes reported he’s often represented his clients “in moral boundaries.”

Utility contracts

In 2019, the FBI commenced questioning nearby officials in Independence about a pair of utility contracts issued by the town council in 2017.

Just one contract identified as for the metropolis to fork out a St. Louis enterprise $9.75 million to tear down a electric power plant that Independence Electrical power and Mild was no more time working with in Missouri Metropolis.

The bid was additional than 2 times that of the other bidder, and the operator of the firm that won it had longstanding ties to the lobbyist for Independence Ability & Light-weight, previous Missouri House Speaker Steve Tilley.

The other contract referred to as for the metropolis to pay out just about $1 million to invest in the previous Rockwood Golf Club in get to create a photo voltaic farm in a joint enterprise with Gardner Cash, a Springfield personal fairness firm.

Gardner Capital is also a Tilley consumer, and just times in advance of the vote to order the home political action committees connected to Tilley and funded Gardner produced four $2,500 donations to Independence Mayor Eileen Weir.

She vehemently denied the donations have been connected to her vote to endorse the venture.

Tilley would later on serve as the lobbyist for Titan Fish, a genuine estate enterprise that marketed the golf training course to the town for close to two times what it experienced paid for it just months before. The FBI interviewed Titan Fish’s owner in the summertime of 2021 about the utility contracts and professional medical cannabis licensing.

According to the Missouri Ethics Fee, as of Sept. 1 Tilley’s lobbying company is no for a longer period registered to lobby on behalf of Independence Electric power & Light-weight.

Weir briefly ran for re-election before this yr but dropped out of the race soon after she barely advanced to the general election. She was replaced by former condition Rep. Rory Rowland.

Independence gained a pair of grand jury subpoenas in early 2020 trying to get information of non-general public conferences of the Independence Town Council receipts submitted by four customers of the Independence Town Council for reimbursement.

Just one of the meetings in question was with Carnes.

The head of Missouri’s healthcare marijuana method testified under oath in late 2020 that a grand jury subpoena his company received was possible related to an FBI investigation in Independence.

There have been no indictments regarding both agreement.

Independence, Mo., lawyer tied to utility projects that drew FBI scrutiny indicted for tax evasion

Independence, Mo., lawyer tied to utility projects that drew FBI scrutiny indicted for tax evasion

An attorney and former elected formal in Independence was indicted Tuesday by a federal grand jury on felonies connected to tax evasion.







Gavel




John C. Carnes, 67, was billed with one particular count of tax evasion, just one rely of corruptly endeavoring to obstruct the IRS and 7 counts of failure to shell out taxes. He appeared in federal courtroom in Kansas Metropolis Wednesday and was launched on bond.

Carnes is a former member of the Jackson County Legislature and Independence Town Council who served two a long time in prison following remaining convicted in 1989 of financial institution fraud and bribing another council member. His legislation license was reinstated in 2006.

Far more not too long ago, Carnes was included in two Independence utility jobs that have confronted yrs of FBI scrutiny — the city’s final decision to order the previous Rockwood Golfing System to construct a photo voltaic farm and the contract to demolish the town-owned energy plant in Missouri Town.

People today are also reading…

In accordance to the indictment, Carnes allegedly prevented spending taxes involving 2012 and 2018 and tried to disguise his tax liability by shifting dollars into legal professional believe in accounts, which are intended to be for resources that are in a lawyer’s possession in link with symbolizing a shopper. He allegedly owes practically $345,000 in again taxes

Federal prosecutors say Carnes deposited $232,000 into lawyer believe in accounts that arrived from expenses for solutions relevant to the sale of the Rockwood Golf Class and the demolition of the Missouri Metropolis Electricity Plant.

The attorney rely on accounts were being utilised, the indictment alleges, to avoid the IRS from accumulating cash Carnes owed on earnings taxes.

Carnes is also alleged to have withdrawn hard cash from lawyer trust accounts to fund his individual and organization expenditures, which includes at Kansas City-space casinos. He also gained funds from customers that he did not deposit into his financial institution accounts.

In an job interview Wednesday with the Kansas City Star, Carnes explained he’s often represented his consumers “inside of ethical boundaries.” 

Utility contracts

In 2019, the FBI began questioning local officers in Independence about a pair of utility contracts issued by the town council in 2017.

1 contract known as for the city to shell out a St. Louis firm $9.75 million to tear down a electrical power plant that Independence Power and Mild was no extended applying in Missouri City.

The bid was more than two times that of the other bidder, and the proprietor of the organization that won it had longstanding ties to the lobbyist for Independence Energy & Gentle, previous Missouri Residence Speaker Steve Tilley. 

The other deal referred to as for the town to pay out approximately $1 million to obtain the previous Rockwood Golfing Club in order to establish a photo voltaic farm in a joint enterprise with Gardner Cash, a Springfield private equity business.

Gardner Capital is also a Tilley client, and just times in advance of the vote to order the home political action committees related to Tilley and funded Gardner produced four $2,500 donations to Independence Mayor Eileen Weir

She vehemently denied the donations were being related to her vote to endorse the job. 

Tilley would afterwards serve as the lobbyist for Titan Fish, a genuine estate company that sold the golfing training course to the metropolis for shut to two times what it experienced compensated for it just months right before. The FBI interviewed Titan Fish’s proprietor in the summer months of 2021 about the utility contracts and health care marijuana licensing. 

In accordance to the Missouri Ethics Commission, as of Sept. 1 Tilley’s lobbying business is no for a longer period registered to lobby on behalf of Independence Energy & Gentle.

Weir briefly ran for reelection before this yr but dropped out of the race after she barely innovative to the typical election. She was replaced by former state Rep. Rory Rowland. 

Independence been given a pair of grand jury subpoenas in early 2020 looking for documents of nonpublic meetings of the Independence City Council receipts submitted by 4 associates of the Independence City Council for reimbursement.

Just one of the meetings in concern was with Carnes.

The head of Missouri’s healthcare cannabis method testified under oath in late 2020 that a grand jury subpoena his company received was possible linked to an FBI investigation in Independence. 

There have been no indictments about either deal.

Missouri Unbiased is aspect of States Newsroom, a community of information bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) community charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Make contact with Editor Jason Hancock for questions: [email protected]. Stick to Missouri Independent on Facebook and Twitter.

Independence MO lawyer John Carnes indicted on tax evasion

Independence MO lawyer John Carnes indicted on tax evasion

Independence

A Horry County lady claims in a fit that Horry County and the South Carolina Section of Transportation are dependable for her husband’s death.

John C. Carnes, an Independence law firm and longtime political operative, has been indicted by a federal grand jury on two felonies related to tax evasion.

Carnes, 67, is billed with felony tax evasion and felony obstruction alongside with 6 misdemeanor counts of failure to pay back cash flow tax, federal prosecutors introduced Wednesday afternoon. The federal indictment against Carnes was handed down Tuesday and made community subsequent his arrest Wednesday early morning.

Just after an preliminary courtroom look in the Western District of Missouri Kansas Metropolis, Carnes was unveiled on bond.

Federal prosecutors allege Carnes averted having to pay money taxes in between 2012 and 2018. He is also accused of trying to disguise his tax legal responsibility by preserving cash for individual bills in an lawyer believe in, a economic account supposed to be made use of solely for representation of clientele.

Carnes owes at least $343,469 in again taxes for the years in between 2012 and 2018, authorities allege.

Arrived at by phone Wednesday evening for remark, Carnes mentioned: “I’ve generally represented my clientele aggressively and efficiently inside moral boundaries.

“The FBI has been investigating me for about 30 a long time,” Carnes stated. “And I’m 67 years outdated, and they had to appear up with anything right before I passed on.

They have appear up with a thing, and we’ll go to courtroom and see what that something is.”

Carnes, a former Jackson County legislator and member of the Independence City Council, has been concerned in lawful hassle in advance of.

In 1989, he pleaded responsible to paying out a bribe to a member of the Independence Metropolis Council for the official’s assist of a zoning matter involving a browsing heart. He also admitted to offering untrue info on a financial institution personal loan in 1987.

Sentenced to 5 yrs in jail, Carnes served two right before his release on parole in 1991. His Missouri legislation license was revoked and later reinstated in 2006.

In spite of his legal issues, Carnes has remained a force in Independence politics for many years.

In accordance to Wednesday’s indictment, Carnes deposited $232,000 in charges acquired for solutions furnished by the former Rockwood Golfing Study course and the Missouri City Energy Plant into his legal professional have faith in accounts. Authorities allege that was completed in an try to protect against the IRS from gathering cash Carnes owed on cash flow taxes.

The Rockwood Golf Study course and Missouri City Energy Plant projects have been resources of controversy in Independence Metropolis Corridor. And the indictment declared Wednesday arrives years after The Star to start with documented that the FBI was asking questions about controversial deals involving Independence’s municipal government.

In May possibly 2020, The Star noted that a federal grand jury subpoenaed minutes of the closed meetings of the Independence Town Council in which the entire body reviewed the destiny of the Missouri Town Ability Plant.

Expense reimbursements sought by the FBI showed that two former council associates, Curt Dougherty and Tom Van Camp, satisfied extra than a dozen periods for taxpayer-funded meals at various area dining establishments to discuss town business amongst Oct 2015 and February 2017, when Missouri Town was put out for bid. That involved a conference with Carnes on July 18, 2016, at Independence’s Café Verona.

The decommissioning of that coal-fired electric powered-plant, owned by the city’s utility organization, captivated controversy mainly because of the conclusion by a bulk of the Metropolis Council to award a agreement to a agency termed Environmental Functions, which bid $9.75 million to do the challenge. Another enterprise, Industrial Liability Companions, submitted a bid for $4.45 million.

Environmental Operations experienced political connections: Its general counsel was previous Missouri Residence Speaker John Diehl, who resigned in 2015 for sending sexually charged text messages to an intern.

The metropolis has faced similar controversies in excess of other electrical power initiatives.

In 2020, a selection of companies led by Titan Fish Associates LLC submitted a proposal to repurpose the Blue Valley Municipal Ability Generating Plant in northeast Independence into a biofuels generation facility. Titan Fish is led by Kansas trader Joe Campbell. Also provided in the proposal was Steve Tilley, a statehouse lobbyist and previous Missouri Residence speaker who is a longtime close friend and adviser to Gov. Mike Parson.

In 2017, the metropolis council voted to order the former Rockwood Golfing Club for virtually $1 million from Titan Fish, just months right after it experienced procured the property for $550,000 from a firm that had owned the closed golfing training course for several years. It has given that created a photo voltaic farm on the site.

The dollars used to order the golf club came from a different Tilley lobbying client, the city’s utility, Independence Electricity & Mild.

Related stories from Kansas City Star

Profile Image of Bill Lukitsch

Monthly bill Lukitsch handles breaking news for The Star. Just before becoming a member of The Star, he lined politics and regional governing administration for the Quad-Metropolis Periods.

House committee votes to release Trump’s tax returns to the public | Donald Trump

House committee votes to release Trump’s tax returns to the public | Donald Trump

A potent congressional committee on Tuesday voted to publicly launch Donald Trump’s tax returns in a shift that is certain to ignite a political row as very well as anger among some privateness professionals in The usa.

The Democratic-managed Dwelling methods and indicates committee decided to release the documents, which the former US president has lengthy tried to defend, right after various hrs of discussion.

The New York Periods formerly unveiled comprehensive chunks of Trump’s tax returns which showed how the authentic estate mogul and actuality Tv set star had endured critical losses and engaged in in depth tax avoidance.

The determination by the panel will come immediately after a very long battle that finally resulted in the supreme court clearing the way last month for the treasury department to mail the returns to Congress. The committee been given 6 a long time of tax returns for Trump and some of his organizations.

As a presidential applicant in 2016, Trump broke many years of precedent by refusing to launch his tax types to the community. He bragged for the duration of a presidential debate that yr that he was “smart” because he paid out no federal taxes and afterwards claimed he wouldn’t individually reward from the 2017 tax cuts he signed into law that favored folks with excessive wealth, asking Us citizens to simply just acquire him at his word.

Tax information would have been a helpful metric for judging his achievements in business enterprise. The image of a savvy businessman was crucial to a political brand name honed during his years as a tabloid magnet and star of The Apprentice television present. They also could reveal any economic obligations – which include overseas debts – that could influence how he ruled.

But Individuals ended up mostly in the darkish about Trump’s marriage with the IRS till October 2018 and September 2020, when The New York Moments revealed two independent collection based on leaked tax information.

The Pulitzer Prize-successful 2018 content articles showed how Trump gained a modern-day equal of at minimum $413m from his father’s true estate holdings, with significantly of that dollars coming from what the Moments termed “tax dodges” in the 1990s.

Trump sued the Occasions and his niece, Mary Trump, in 2021 for furnishing the data to the newspaper. In November, Mary Trump questioned an appeals courtroom to overturn a judge’s selection to reject her statements that her uncle and two of his siblings defrauded her of thousands and thousands of pounds in a 2001 household settlement.

The 2020 content articles showed that Trump paid just $750 in federal cash flow taxes in 2017 and 2018. Trump paid no cash flow taxes at all in 10 of the previous 15 yrs since he commonly missing a lot more money than he manufactured.

Specifics about Trump’s revenue from international operations and financial debt stages were also contained in the tax filings, which the former president derided as “fake news”.

The Manhattan district attorney’s workplace also acquired copies of Trump’s tax data in February 2021 just after following a protracted lawful struggle that involved two journeys to the supreme courtroom.

The workplace, then led by District Legal professional Cyrus Vance Jr, experienced subpoenaed Trump’s accounting agency in 2019, searching for entry to eight a long time of Trump’s tax returns and related documents.

The DA’s place of work issued the subpoena right after Trump’s former personalized attorney Michael Cohen informed Congress that Trump experienced misled tax officials, insurers and small business associates about the worth of his property. All those allegations are the subject matter of a fraud lawsuit that New York legal professional normal Letitia James filed from Trump and his firm in September.

Trump’s longtime accountant, Donald Bender, testified at the Trump Organization’s recent prison trial that Trump described losses on his tax returns every yr for a 10 years, which includes just about $700m in 2009 and $200m in 2010.

The Trump Business was convicted earlier this month on tax fraud costs for supporting some executives dodge taxes on company-paid benefits such as residences and luxurious cars and trucks.

Republicans, meanwhile, have railed towards the possible launch, arguing that it would established a harmful precedent.

Trump has argued there is small to be gleaned from the tax returns even as he has fought to continue to keep them private. “You simply cannot study considerably from tax returns, but it is unlawful to release them if they are not yours!” he complained on his social media community final weekend.

Congressman Kevin Brady of Texas, the techniques and signifies committee’s Republican leader, has accused Democrats on the committee of “unleashing a risky new political weapon that reaches considerably beyond President Trump, and jeopardizes the privateness of every American”.

The Associated Press contributed to this report

Tax Planning To Reduce The Effects Of The FTX Collapse: Advice From A Canadian Tax Lawyer – Capital Gains Tax

Tax Planning To Reduce The Effects Of The FTX Collapse: Advice From A Canadian Tax Lawyer – Capital Gains Tax

Introduction: Significant Cryptocurrency Crash Impacts
Investors Globally

On Friday, November 11, 2022, the cryptocurrency derivatives
exchange FTX Trading Ltd. revealed that it had applied for Chapter
11 bankruptcy protection in the United States. The company had
previously been valued at over USD $32 billion. This signaled
FTX’s collapse.

Only a week had passed since Binance, FTX’s main rival in
the cryptocurrency exchange market and an investor in FTX,
announced that it would be selling a sizable portion of its
holdings in the native cryptocurrency tokens of FTX, or FTT,
sparking widespread investor concern and speculating about
FTX’s financial stability.

Concerns about FTX’s true solvency were raised as a result
of FTX’s collapse, also known as the FTX crash, and a leaked balance sheet that
revealed that Alameda Research, a quantitative cryptocurrency
trading company linked to FTX and its CEO, Samuel Bankman-Fried,
owned the majority of FTT in circulation. To the amazement of
cryptocurrency investors worldwide, one of cryptocurrency’s
most well-known public forces has completely collapsed following a
failed bailout by Binance.

Many cryptocurrency traders who had stakes on FTX have lost
access to their assets as a result of FTX’s collapse. The FTX
crash has significantly reduced investor trust across the entire
cryptocurrency market, which has caused a significant decline in
value across almost all cryptocurrency assets. And many Canadian
cryptocurrency investors have witnessed a significant decline in
the value of their holdings as a result of the FTX meltdown. When
disposing of any assets, care must be taken for Canadian taxpayers
who invested in cryptocurrencies and want to continue their trading
or investment operations.

A tax savey Canadian trader of cryptocurrencies should now take
the FTX fall as a tax planning opportunity and focus on realizing
losses immediately in order to maximize future tax savings on the
legitimate disposal of their investment. The “stop-loss”
provisions of the Canadian Income Tax Act, in particular
the “superficial loss” provisions for individual
taxpayers, are there to prevent just such a tax win for Canadian
taxpayers.

Understanding these regulations is essential to keeping your crypto tax deductions for cryptocurrency
losses intact and figuring out how to take advantage of market
changes like the ones that have occurred since FTX’s collapse.
Speak to one of our knowledgeable cryptocurrency tax lawyers in Canada to better
understand your filing situation and options if you are a Canadian
cryptocurrency investor trying to learn from the FTX crash,
evaluate how to maximize your tax savings, and plan for the
future.

Accrued Losses and the Application of the Canadian Income
Tax Act
‘s “Superficial Loss” Rules

Several restrictions in the Canadian Income Tax Act
prevent Canadian taxpayers from experiencing “superficial
losses” on their property. These rules are intended to stop a
Canadian taxpayer from artificially realizing an incurred capital
loss by selling a property and then buying it back right away in
order to capture the loss. A “superficial loss” is a loss from the
disposal of a specific capital asset in the following
circumstances, as defined by Section 54 of the Canadian Income
Tax Act
:

  • The taxpayer or an “affiliated” person (which
    includes, among other relationships, spouses, common-law partners,
    and controlled corporations, but excludes parents and children)
    acquires a substituted property that is the same property or
    “identical” to the previously owned property between the
    beginning of the period of 30 days before and the end of the period
    of 30 days after the disposition; and,

  • The substituted property was owned by the taxpayer or an
    affiliated person at the conclusion of the 61-day window, or they
    had the option to do so.

The Canadian Income Tax Act‘s subparagraph
40(2)(g)(i) states that a taxpayer’s loss from the sale of a
property, to the extent it is a superficial loss, is presumed to be
zero. So, unless the taxpayer disposes of the property with a
definitive intent, he or she is not permitted to deduct that loss.
Additionally, the standards remain the same when a taxpayer
purchases an “identical” replaced property. When
determining a Canadian taxpayer’s preference, the CRA has taken
the stance that “properties which are the same in all material
respects, so that a prospective buyer would not prefer one as
opposed to another” are included as “identical”
properties for the purposes of section 54 of the Canadian Income
Tax Act defining a superficial loss.

In the context of specific businesses, Subsection 18(14) offers
a comparable superficial loss provision. In particular, it applies
where a Canadian taxpayer sells a piece of property that is listed
in the inventory of a business that is “an adventure or
concern in the nature of trade.” Comparable to section 54,
subsection 18(14) is applicable when the taxpayer or an affiliated
person acquires the same or an identical property during the 61-day
period beginning 30 days before and 30 days after the disposition,
and at the end of that time, the taxpayer or affiliated person owns
or has the right to the substituted property. Similar to
subparagraph 40(2)(g)(i), subsection 18(15) determines the loss on
disposition to be nil if it was only a superficial loss.

The definition of “business” in subsection 248(1) of
the Canadian Income Tax Act includes “an adventure or
concern in the nature of trade.” It follows that while a
business must necessarily be an adventure or a concern in business,
the opposite is not always true. Generally speaking, a business
exists when a Canadian taxpayer continually engages in a trade or
profession with the intent to profit. An “adventure or concern
in the nature of trade” usually refers to a single transaction
or series of transactions in which a Canadian taxpayer purchases
property with the goal of reselling it for a profit. Analyses will
be extremely fact-driven when determining whether a Canadian
taxpayer is running a legitimate business, an adventure or concern
in the nature of trade.

In general, income losses are not subject to the laws governing
superficial losses. Thus, a taxpayer is not prevented from
crystallizing a loss on the non-capital property in the absence of
the application of these superficial loss rules or any other
superficial loss rules that may apply under the Canadian Income
Tax Act
. While crystallizing operational losses from that
trading business, a cryptocurrency trader functioning as a pure
trading business may be able to sell and repurchase inventory
without triggering the superficial loss restrictions.

Whether this crystallization is feasible will be totally
dependent on whether a cryptocurrency trader’s activities are
classified as a business, in which case crystallization is
possible, or an adventure in the nature of trade or an investment,
in which case the superficial loss rules will be applicable. In
these situations, the taxpayer will suffer because the disposition
will set off the superficial loss rules. This might be the case if
a Canadian taxpayer invests in cryptocurrency hedge funds and
investment portfolios rather than actively trading cryptocurrency
assets, or if the taxpayer holds cryptocurrency tokens as long-term
investments.

The Taxation of Cryptocurrency Tokens Dispositions: As a
Business or Capital Investment?

The type of income earned affects the type of asset disposed of
under the Canadian Income Tax Act. In order to
characterize the sort of income earned or loss incurred, the
analysis starts there. No Canadian court has issued a clear ruling
on the taxation of cryptocurrencies, and the Canada Revenue Agency
has not issued any cogent guidelines of its own on how to classify
cryptocurrencies for Canadian tax purposes.

However, the body of Canadian case law addressing the
classification of business and investment income, as well as
capital gains, offers some fundamental guidelines for assessing the
classification of a Canadian taxpayer’s cryptocurrency
transactions. Although the courts have not recognized a single
aspect as being conclusive, important considerations for
establishing whether a property transaction is being done for
capital or as a component of a business include:

  • The type of sold property.

  • The duration of taxpayer’s ownership.

  • The number or regularity of other similar transactions by the
    taxpayer.

  • The time spent working on or in relation to the property
    realized.

  • The events that led to the sale; and,

  • The motive for both the taxpayer’s purchase of the property
    and its selling is crucial for cryptocurrency holders.

As a result, the tax treatment of a Canadian taxpayer’s
acquisition and sale of a cryptocurrency token will depend on a
number of factual factors. Your reasons for trading and investing
in different cryptocurrencies, as well as your reasons for selling
your holdings, will all be taken into account when determining
whether the proceeds from the sale of your holdings will be taxed
as capital gains or as business income.

Tax Pro Tip – Beware Against Getting Complacent. Keep Thorough
Records and Obtain a Written Legal Opinion Before Filing.

When confronted with the potential application of the
superficial loss regulations under the Canadian Income Tax
Act
, a Canadian taxpayer should always take a cautious
approach. This is particularly true if you take the stance that
your losses were from a business and not the sale of capital
property. A business loss has much more tax benefits than a capital
loss. One may deduct all losses and costs related to business or
investment activity, but only half of the capital losses are fully deductible.

Therefore, the best defenses you have against a reassessment by
CRA following a tax audit are caution and diligence. Even
while you may believe that your transactions classify your proceeds
and losses as coming from a business, it’s always possible that
the CRA and Canadian courts would hold a different opinion, and
disputing those views can be an expensive undertaking.

Consequently, it’s essential to keep proper records of your
cryptocurrency trading activities to prevent the harshest tax
enforcement actions. You should always keep your own trading
records and never rely on cryptocurrency exchanges to keep track of
your transactions. In addition to other previous cryptocurrency
exchanges like QuadrigaCX, the FTX catastrophe is the ideal
illustration of what may go wrong if you don’t conduct your own
due diligence. That is, you might be required to act quickly to
gather the proof you need to refute an unfair CRA tax audit or
reassessment, and the onus will be on you to refute their
presumptions.

Additionally, getting a tax memo on how to characterize your
proceeds and losses from cryptocurrency dispositions could be
beneficial to you. In the event that you are ever subject to a CRA
tax audit over your cryptocurrency dispositions, obtaining a tax
memorandum is a significant piece of evidence proving that you
exercised due diligence while calculating your correct Canadian
income tax filing position. Furthermore, there may still be ways to
consolidate your losses if your cryptocurrency holdings may be
considered capital assets.

Since two cryptocurrencies do not qualify as equivalent
properties, disposing of one and buying another right away (like
trading Bitcoin for Ethereum) should prevent the superficial loss
rules from being applied. For cryptocurrency investors, this gives
a very potent option for tax planning, although this approach will
be strongly influenced by the investor’s specific facts and
circumstances. In order to guard against CRA overreach and the
denial of your valid business losses, our competent Canadian
cryptocurrency tax lawyers can offer more formative advice on
how to keep your records and provide you with legally-justified
opinions on the proper reporting position of your cryptocurrency
dispositions.

FAQs

What Does FTX Mean in Crypto?

The Bahamas-based cryptocurrency exchange FTX specialized in
leveraged products and derivatives. By enabling users to connect
with their crypto wallets, exchange cryptocurrencies and NFTS,
trade, and more, the FTX cryptocurrency exchange supported the
liquidation and transfers of coins and tokens. Additionally, it
promoted collectibles transactions. Due to current cryptocurrency
restrictions, US citizens were not allowed to trade on its
platform; however, customers from other countries were able to use
it up until the company filed for bankruptcy and investigations
started, which caused the FTX crash.

What Exactly Does FTX Mean?

Another example of the effects of cryptocurrency crashes is the
cryptocurrency trading company known by the full name Futures
Exchange (FTX), which has since experienced a collapse.

What happened in the FTX Crash?

FTX Trading Ltd., the second-largest cryptocurrency derivatives
exchange in the world at the time, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
in the United States in November 2022. The abrupt liquidation of
FTX’s native cryptocurrency token FTT by Binance, its closest
competitor, served as the catalyst for the company’s downfall.
Binance’s failed attempt to acquire FTX after it fell into a
freefall also contributed to the collapse of FTX. A significant
decline in the value of cryptocurrency tokens was caused by the
market crisis brought on by the FTX crash, which affected almost
all cryptocurrency investors and portfolios.

A “Superficial Loss” is What?

A “superficial loss” occurs under the various
provisions of the Income Tax Act when a Canadian taxpayer
disposes of qualifying property and, within the period beginning 30
days before and 30 days after the disposition, the taxpayer or a
person with whom he or she is affiliated acquires an
“identical” or the same to the property being disposed
of. The taxpayer’s loss from the disposition, to the extent it
is deemed superficial, shall be considered to be nothing if the
taxpayer or an affiliated person holds the property at the
conclusion of the 61-day period. The Canadian Income Tax
Act
‘s rules on superficial losses are intended to stop
Canadian taxpayers from artificially realizing accrued losses for
tax planning purposes when there isn’t actually a sense of
finality to the disposition.

What Does “Crystallize” My Tax Losses
Mean?

When a piece of property is disposed of, a gain or loss is
realized for tax purposes. Theoretically, a taxpayer may sell an
asset when its value is low and then buy it back right away to
assure access to the losses for tax planning purposes. However, the
Canadian Income Tax Act contains a number of complex
regulations that discourage improper tax planning by inducing
“superficial losses.” To make sure these regulations do
not apply to deny you those losses, every attempt to crystallize
your losses should be reviewed and overseen by an experienced
Canadian crypto tax lawyer.

In cases where your cryptocurrency holdings qualify as capital
assets, an expert Canadian crypto tax lawyer can also assist in
determining what tax planning opportunities exist to crystallize
your losses. These opportunities include planning the repurchase of
the same cryptocurrencies after the superficial loss limitation
period has expired as well as swapping your cryptocurrency holdings
for other cryptocurrencies that do not qualify as identical
properties.

How Are Superficial Loss Rules Differently Applicable to
Business Losses and Capital Losses from Cryptocurrency
Transactions?

A Canadian taxpayer with holdings of cryptocurrency tokens
treated as a long term investment may receive proceeds of
disposition as a capital gain or from a business, as an adventure
or concern in trade, which is an income transaction rather than a
capital gain. In these situations, the Canadian Income Tax
Act
‘s superficial loss regulations will restrict the
Canadian taxpayer from selling and buying cryptocurrency tokens
again to realize cumulative losses. The lesson we can learn from
FTX’s collapse is that the superficial loss rules may be
inapplicable to a disposition or reacquisition if a Canadian
taxpayer is actively engaged in a trading business, and only for
tax planning purposes, such a Canadian taxpayer is allowed to
crystallize operating losses.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.

Singh v. Canada: A Canadian Tax Lawyer’s Observations On TFSA Penalties – Tax Authorities

Tax Planning To Reduce The Effects Of The FTX Collapse: Advice From A Canadian Tax Lawyer – Capital Gains Tax

INTRODUCTION – TAX PENALTY AND INTEREST RELIEF FOR
OVERCONTRIBUTIONS TO A TFSA

As of 2009, Canadian tax residents over 18 years old have been
entitled to establish a tax-free savings account (“TFSA”).
Unlike a Registered Retirement Savings Plan (“RRSP”), you
are not entitled to deduct your contributions to a TFSA against
your income. In turn, the withdrawals made from a TFSA will be
tax-free. Thus, a Canadian taxpayer does not pay tax on interest,
dividends, capital gains or other income that accumulates within a
TFSA.

The TFSA is a powerful tax planning tool for families and
individuals to begin saving for retirement or significant life
purchases, like a family home. Your ability to contribute to a TFSA
is not unlimited, however, and is capped by the Canadian Income
Tax Act
. For each year that a Canadian tax resident has been eligible to
establish a TFSA, the dollar limit for contributions increases by
roughly $5,000 to $6,000 per year, with rates gradually adjusted
for inflation. The dollar limit is cumulative, and so an
individual’s contribution room will increase every year, even
if a TFSA was never opened by or contributed to by an
individual.

Excess contributions above an individual’s TFSA dollar
amount can generate significant tax penalties. If, at any time
during the year, you make a TFSA contribution that exceeds your
TFSA contribution room, subsection 207.02(1) of the Income Tax
Act
imposes a penalty tax on that excess contributed amount at
a rate of 1{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} per month. You must also file a special tax return
reporting the TFSA penalty tax (Form RC243, “Tax-Free
Savings Account Return” and Form RC243-SCH-A, “Schedule A
– Excess TFSA Amounts”), and you may suffer additional
penalties for failing to file this return should you be aware of
the overcontributed amounts. The penalty tax is also subject to
interest at the prescribed rate.

The Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) is granted the power
to waive some or all of an individual’s accrued penalties and
interest for excess contributions to a TFSA under the Income
Tax Act
. More specifically, subsection 207.06(1) of the
Income Tax Act provides that the CRA may exercise its
discretion if the taxpayer establishes that the liability was:

  • The consequence of a reasonable error; and

  • The excess TFSA amounts are removed from the TFSA without
    delay.

Both elements of the test must be satisfied before the CRA is
entitled to provide relief. The case of Singh v. Canada,
2022 FC 346 (“Singh”) demonstrates that, even if the
circumstances a taxpayer faces are sympathetic, that it may not be
enough for the CRA to offer discretionary relief from penalties and
interest for overcontributions to a TFSA. The taxpayer in
Singh escaped the worst of TFSA overcontribution penalties
and interest given the amount of money involved. However, had the
taxpayer been more diligent with managing her tax affairs, she may
have been able to avoid years of litigation. If you are ever in
doubt concerning your TFSA contributions or what opportunities may
exist under the Income Tax Act to benefit from CRA’s
relief programs, you should be proactive and consult an expert
Canadian tax lawyer.

THE FACTS OF SINGH

The Appellant taxpayer received $41,000 in proceeds from the
sale of her house following her divorce from her husband. On the
advice of her bank advisor, she moved those funds into her TFSA.
However, the taxpayer failed to obtain expert Canadian tax advice
and therefore made two crucial errors:

  1. The taxpayer’s contribution room was well below $41,000 in
    the year that she moved the funds into her TFSA. The bank advisor
    had failed to explain to the taxpayer that there was a contribution
    limit to TFSA accounts.

  2. Following the sale of her former house, the taxpayer’s
    husband filed her tax returns. The taxpayer’s husband failed to
    update her mailing address with the CRA, and the taxpayer never did
    so herself. She thus missed any letters the CRA had sent her
    concerning her overcontributions.

The taxpayer continued contributing funds to her TFSA throughout
2016 and 2017. On the taxpayer’s 2017 notice of assessment, she
was notified that she owed $3,733.04 in tax, interest and penalties
on her excess TFSA contributions. The taxpayer moved to pay the
outstanding amount immediately when she had learned of the
fact.

The taxpayer applied for relief under CRA’s Taxpayer Relief
Program twice in 2019, unsuccessfully. After exhausting CRA’s
internal review options, the taxpayer launched a self-represented
appeal to the Federal Court for judicial review of the CRA’s
decision concerning her second taxpayer relief application. The
taxpayer argued that the CRA’s decision to decline awarding
relief from penalties and interest was unreasonable.

THE RULING OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

On judicial review, the Canadian tax litigation lawyer for the
CRA argued that the taxpayer’s error was not a reasonable
error. The Federal Court observed that the applicable standard for
judicial review followed from the Supreme Court of Canada’s
decision in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v.
Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65. Specifically, under the Vavilov
framework, a reviewing court must consider whether the CRA’s
reasoning process, in light of the experience of its delegate,
suffered from a “failure of rationality internal to the
reasoning process”, or whether the decision was
“untenable in light of the relevant factual and legal
constraints.” Absent an exceptional case, a reviewing court
will not interfere with the factual findings made by a
decision-maker, and the reviewing court must treat the decision
made with deference.

In applying the Vavilov framework, the Federal Court
found that the CRA’s decision to deny relief was reasonable.
The taxpayer argued that she had not made the mistakes
purposefully, and that the wrongful advice of her bank advisor
combined with her husband’s failure to update her mailing
address prevented her from receiving the letters from the CRA
advising her of her TFSA contributions, which would have prompted
her to correct the matter. The Federal Court concluded, however,
that the CRA acted reasonably in finding that the taxpayer was
ultimately responsible for meeting her obligations under the law.
The assessment of a reasonable error falls on an objective view of
a taxpayer’s circumstances. Specifically, the issue concerning
her bank advisor’s failure to communicate TFSA contribution
limit rules to her was an issue solely between herself and her
bank. Further, the CRA is only obligated to show that notice is
sent to the latest address of a taxpayer, and not receipt of
notice, to hold a taxpayer accountable for taxes owing. The nature
of Canada’s self-assessment system for taxes required that
taxpayers act diligently in reporting to CRA and acting in response
to CRA’s communications. Intent may be a factor that can be
considered by CRA in finding whether an error was reasonable or
not, but is unlikely to constitute a reasonable error in of
itself.

PRO TAX TIP: KEEP YOUR INFORMATION WITH THE CANADA REVENUE
AGENCY UP-TO-DATE

As discussed above, the CRA’s power to waive penalty tax on
TFSA overcontributions is largely a discretionary power. Although
the CRA is required to view every situation holistically and on its
own facts, it has expressed that an error is more likely to be
viewed as reasonable where it was the result of extraordinary
circumstances beyond a taxpayer’s control. More specifically,
this might include cases where a taxpayer is facing a serious
illness, or where the actions of the CRA itself resulted in the
error.

The CRA has consistently taken the position that ignorance of
law alone will not constitute a reasonable error. A lack of
awareness concerning a taxpayer’s TFSA contribution room
therefore may not meet the threshold of reasonable error. And as
can be seen in the case of the taxpayer in Singh, the
failure to update your mailing address to receive letters on-time
from CRA is also not a reasonable error. It is your responsibility
to remove over-contributions from your TFSA account as soon as you
are aware of the error. The CRA will treat any letter that it sends
to a taxpayer as effective notice of their over-contributions. It
is absolutely crucial that you ensure your information with CRA is
up-to-date and current so that you do not miss any letters. Your
mailing address provided to CRA is not a declaration of your
residence status and is only an administrative matter used to
ensure that you receive communications from the CRA. Should you
receive a letter from the CRA about over-contributions to your TFSA
account, you should immediately speak with one of our expert Canadian tax lawyers to discuss your options
for applying for relief from TFSA overcontribution penalty tax.

FAQs

What are the TFSA over-contribution rules?

Excess contributions to your tax-free savings account result in
a TFSA penalty tax. If, at any time during the year, you make a
TFSA contribution that exceeds your TFSA contribution room, you
incur an TFSA penalty tax on the excess amount at a rate of 1{c024931d10daf6b71b41321fa9ba9cd89123fb34a4039ac9f079a256e3c1e6e8} per
month. You must also file a special tax return reporting the TFSA
penalty tax (Form RC243, “Tax-Free Savings Account
Return” and Form RC243-SCH-A, “Schedule A – Excess TFSA
Amounts”), and you may suffer an additional penalty for
failing to file this return. The penalty tax is also subject to
interest at the prescribed rate.

What are the conditions for obtaining relief from TFSA
overcontribution penalties and interest under the Income Tax
Act
?

The Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) is granted the power
to waive some or all of an individual’s accrued penalties and
interest for excess contributions to a TFSA under the Income
Tax Act
. More specifically, subsection 207.06(1) of the
Income Tax Act provides that the CRA may exercise its
discretion if the taxpayer establishes that the liability was:

  1. The consequence of a reasonable error; and

  2. The excess TFSA amounts are removed from the TFSA without
    delay.

Both elements of the test must be satisfied before the CRA is
entitled to provide relief.

What was the Federal Court’s judgement in Singh v.
Canada
, 2022 FC 346?

The Federal Court found that the CRA had acted reasonably in
denying the taxpayer relief from TFSA over-contribution penalty
tax. The taxpayer had failed to update her mailing address after
moving from her family home and had received erroneous advice from
her bank advisor about TFSA contribution limits. The CRA found that
her ignorance of the tax law was not a reasonable error, and that
it was her responsibility to update her mailing address to receive
communications from the CRA notifying her of her
over-contributions. Although the taxpayer never intended to
over-contribute, the Federal Court found the CRA was justified in
concluding that the over-contributions were not the result of a
reasonable error.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.