An Iowa choose has dismissed a lawsuit alleging Open up Records Regulation violations by Auditor of State Rob Sand.
The court docket concluded the email messages that a conservative regulation agency had sougt to obtain “were thoroughly maintained as confidential and withheld” from disclosure. The courtroom granted Sand’s request for summary judgment, dismissing the situation.
“We are dedicated to transparency, but also to shielding whistleblowers who support us uncover squander, fraud, and corruption,” Sand reported in a created statement issued soon after the ruling. “We’ve experienced all people from suitable-wing media outlets to the Democratic National Committee check with for documents that could possibly establish tipsters. Our respond to is the exact each individual time: We must deny requests that would chip away at our capability to shield whistleblowers and help you save taxpayers dollars. Iowans can belief the Condition Auditor’s Business.”
Sand had instructed the court docket his office’s attempts to secure taxpayers would be “kneecapped” if he was pressured to disclose communications with whistleblowers.
The e-mail in query ended up requested previous yr by the Kirkwood Institute, a self-described “conservative community-desire law company.” The Kirkwood Institute acknowledged it asked for the e-mail as component of its possess investigation into what it termed “the likely political overtones” of Sand’s 2021 report on Gov. Kim Reynolds’ appearance in public-support bulletins about COVID-19.
In arguing for dismissal of the lawsuit, lawyers for Sand’s office claimed the requested data could be lawfully withheld.
In the latest courtroom filings, they claimed the institute’s “conclusion that whistleblowers who contact the auditor with allegations of misconduct or noncompliance will have to have their communications disclosed upon request would kneecap the auditor’s constitutional and statutory responsibility to safeguard taxpayer income and assistance guarantee open up and accountable authorities. Whistleblowers in each the public and private sector would fairly dread retaliation should their allegations of misconduct or noncompliance be disclosed.”
Sand’s June 2021 report on Reynolds’ media campaign alleged that since the governor appeared in taxpayer-funded videos, the marketing campaign violated a condition law that usually prohibits the expenditure of community cash to disseminate the likeness of a statewide elected official.
The law, on the other hand, incorporates an exemption for expenses similar to the use of unexpected emergency powers, and the Iowa Ethics and Marketing campaign Disclosure Board later on concluded Sand’s issues lacked any merit.
Immediately after the audit report was published, the Kirkwood Institute – which is basically previous Muscatine County prosecutor Alan Ostergren, the organization’s president and lawful counsel — embarked on an investigation into Sand’s steps. In court papers, Ostergren claimed it “appeared that a politically sympathetic blogger,” a reference to Bleeding Heartland’s Laura Belin, “and a equally aligned Involved Press reporter” experienced opted to report on the auditor’s results and in so performing they experienced “amplified its faulty lawful conclusions.”
The media reviews about Sand’s results “raised the genuine prospect that Auditor Sand had misused general public sources to go after personal political obtain,” Ostergren alleged.
Previously this summer time, President Biden issued a memorandum that extended and expanded Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) for Liberians until June 30, 2024. The president delivered just cursory justification for continuing to exempt most Liberians from immigration enforcement.
(This is in the news once more due to the fact USCIS right now printed a Federal Register notice about operate and journey authorization for Liberians with DED.)
According to USCIS, DED defers “the removal of any Liberian nationwide, or specific devoid of nationality who last habitually resided in Liberia, who is current in the United States and who was covered beneath DED as of June 30, 2022.” It also defers the elimination of “any Liberian nationwide, or particular person without having nationality who past habitually resided in Liberia, who has been constantly physically current in the United States due to the fact May 20, 2017.” DED extends the ability to keep and function to illegal aliens and to people today with noinimmigrant (momentary) visas.
Not like most government actions that shield aliens in the United States illegally from immigration enforcement, DED is not predicated on prosecutorial discretion. Rather, DED was created as an off-shoot of the president’s international affairs powers underneath Posting II of the U.S. Constitution. So long as the president thinks that granting defense from removal and perform authorization is in the foreign affairs pursuits of the United States, the argument goes, the president is in a position to develop this extra-statutory coverage, and the president can do this no matter of regardless of whether the this sort of application stands in immediate conflict with federal immigration law provisions. Presidents have issued DED despite that point that the U.S. Structure gives Congress, not the executive, plenary electricity around immigration.
As the Centre for Immigration Reports has described in bigger element, Liberians were to start with provided momentary security from deportation in 1991 when their country was engaged in a civil war, less than a statutory foundation referred to as Momentary Guarded Status (TPS). Congress developed TPS to rein in the govt branch’s in excess of-use of parole by furnishing a lawful mechanism to let specific detachable aliens subject to critical humanitarian fears at property to continue to be and perform in the United States. Notably, section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act only permits DHS to designate TPS to nations around the world matter to 1) an ongoing armed conflict that would “pose a major risk to the personal safety” of the country’s nationals if returned 2) an environmental disaster earning such place “unable, briefly, to manage adequately the return” or 3) incredible and non permanent circumstances that ought to reduce nationals “from returning to the state in safety”.
Protections for Liberians from deportation have been prolonged at any time due to the fact by six distinct presidents — George H.W. Bush, Invoice Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, Donald Trump, and Joseph Biden — on the other hand, it has most normally taken the form of DED now that TPS is no extended justified below the regulation. TPS was granted one more time in 2014, but not owing to political conditions. At that time, TPS was justified as a end result of the outbreak of Ebola virus disorder in West Africa. President Obama promptly restarted DED for Liberians at the time Liberia’s TPS designation was established to expire, citing only “compelling international coverage reasons”.
Since DED is derived exclusively from the president’s overseas affairs powers and has no statutory basis, there are no procedural specifications or authorized thresholds that must be met in buy for the president to challenge or extend the security. Accordingly, the president is equipped to keep on to challenge and extend DED without any articulation of the unique overseas coverage interests that are served by its continued use.
In truth, in his June memorandum, President Biden ongoing to justify the extension by simply stating that there are “compelling international plan reasons” to prolong DED and deliver security from elimination to these who arrived in the United States by means of Might 20, 2017 (the date of former President Trump’s most latest extension). What the compelling international policy motives are, whether or not these factors outweigh other plan factors, or irrespective of whether particular procedure for Liberians is justified when nationals from virtually each individual other state (aside from Venezuela and Hong Kong, which are also coated by DED) need to abide by the immigration regulations established by Congress, nonetheless, is evidently none of the public’s business enterprise.
Trump after attempted to pay an attorney’s lawful expenses with a horse, per David Enrich’s upcoming e-book.
The offer you comprised a deed to a stallion in exchange for $2 million in charges, Enrich wrote.
Trump stated what he provided was “a little something more worthwhile,” the New York Instances reporter wrote.
Former President Donald Trump after tried to shell out off some $2 million in legal service fees with a deed to a horse, in accordance a new e book by David Enrich, a enterprise investigations journalist with the New York Periods.
As reported by the outlet, Enrich’s guide states that the give was created in the 1990s, when Trump had racked up all over $2 million in legal costs with a prestigious law agency.
Enrich wrote that Trump experienced “refused to shell out” and that the attorney ultimately dropped his patience and designed an unannounced take a look at to Trump Tower, for every The Guardian.
“A person despatched him up to Trump’s workplace. Trump was at first pleased to see him – he failed to betray any feeling of sheepishness – but the lawyer was steaming,” Enrich wrote, for each the outlet. He noted that the attorney was “incredibly dissatisfied” and couldn’t see any rationale why Trump, who was a authentic-estate businessman at the time, hadn’t compensated up.
“Trump designed some apologetic noises. Then he reported: ‘I’m not likely to shell out your monthly bill. I am heading to give you anything additional valuable.’ What on earth is he chatting about?’ the lawyer puzzled,” Enrich wrote, for every The Guardian.
Per the outlet, the Periods reporter included that Trump said, “I have a stallion. It really is truly worth $5 million.” According to Enrich’s e book, Trump then started searching as a result of a filing cabinet and pulled out a “deed to a horse.”
In accordance to Enrich, the lawyer was initially too surprised by the offer to speak but inevitably retorted: “This is just not the 1800s.” Per The Guardian, Enrich mentioned in his ebook that Trump compensated “at minimum a portion of what he owed.”
A consultant at Trump’s submit-presidential press workplace did not right away answer to a request for remark from Insider.
Previously studies recommend Trump has a history of not paying out the lawyers close to him.
In 2021, for occasion, a e-book by Michael Wolff titled “Landslide: The Closing Times of the Trump Presidency,” uncovered how Trump was annoyed that Rudy Giuliani requested to be paid for his function, which was billed at some $20,000 a working day.
In the meantime, the Republican Nationwide Committee has been encouraging Trump to pay back his lawful bills but claimed it would end doing so really should he kick off his 2024 marketing campaign. In 2021, the RNC committed to expending virtually $2 million on Trump’s lawful service fees, even though it is not bankrolling his lawsuit over the FBI’s raid on his Mar-a-Lago house past month.
Signage is witnessed inside the Lloyd’s of London developing in the Metropolis of London fiscal district in London, Britain, April 16, 2019. Image taken April 16, 2019. REUTERS/Hannah McKay
Sign up now for Cost-free unlimited obtain to Reuters.com
Summary
Legislation companies
Linked documents
Condition-courtroom jury in Houston finds protection for lost money, bills from virus-connected limits
Lloyd’s syndicates on hook for $12 mln, Baylor’s law firm suggests
(Reuters) – Baylor College of Medication has damaged the insurance plan industry’s string of wins in Covid-linked small business earnings-interruption circumstances with a $12 million jury verdict versus various Lloyd’s of London syndicates in state courtroom in Houston, Texas.
1000’s of this kind of circumstances have been submitted against all-danger commercial assets insurers across the nation, but only a handful have long gone to trial. Baylor’s circumstance is thought to be the very first to outcome in a plaintiff’s verdict.
The overwhelming vast majority of federal and point out courts to take into account the query have identified that the virus does not result in any “direct actual physical reduction or injury to” assets, resulting in pretrial wins for the insurers, according to the College of Pennsylvania’s Covid Protection Litigation Tracker.
Register now for Free of charge endless accessibility to Reuters.com
In Baylor’s situation, having said that, “we experienced a brave point out courtroom judge who made a decision that the dilemma of no matter whether the virus leads to direct actual physical reduction or injury to house is a simple fact problem for the jury,” lead attorney Murray Fogler of Fogler, Brar, O’Neil & Grey claimed in an e-mail Friday.
The jury in Harris County District Courtroom deliberated for fewer than a day just before returning its verdict for the health-related university on Wednesday.
District Choose Donna Roth has not nonetheless entered the verdict as a judgment. When she does, Fogler claimed, Lloyd’s will “certainly” attractiveness.
Lloyd’s direct attorney, G. Brian Odom of Zelle, did not answer to a ask for for comment on Friday.
Baylor filed suit in September 2020 against the Lloyd’s underwriters and two other insurers, ACE American Insurance plan Co. and XL Insurance policy The united states. In overall, the insurers’ procedures furnished $100 million in protection.
In an amended criticism in January 2021, Baylor alleged that state and county orders created to slow the pandemic’s distribute experienced forced it to “dramatically reduce” operations at its clinics, carry out telehealth expert services, and substantially curtail its laboratory study and teaching plans, at a charge of $70 million and counting. And considering the fact that the clinics remained open up, Baylor said, the virus was constantly existing on the home.
Roth entered judgment for ACE and XL past 12 months simply because the air pollution exclusions in their procedures also described viruses. (Baylor is captivating these rulings.)
The judge sent the situation towards the Lloyd’s syndicates to demo because none of their plan exclusions mentioned viruses.
On Wednesday, the jury place Baylor’s losses at $48.5 million. Because the Lloyd’s syndicates furnished one particular-fourth of the insurance protection, they will be dependable for one-fourth of the damages, Fogler said.
The situation is Baylor Higher education of Medicine v. XL Insurance The us et al., District Court of Harris County, Texas, No. 2020-53316.
For Baylor College or university of Medicine: Murray Fogler of Fogler, Brar, O’Neil & Gray
For the Lloyd’s syndicates: G. Brian Odom of Zelle
Sign up now for Absolutely free limitless accessibility to Reuters.com
How the Legislation, the Individuals, and the Difficulties Make Truck Accident Lawsuits Distinct
Most grownup Us citizens have at least some general plan what the process is for resolving automobile accidents and the insurance policies statements they produce, possibly from becoming on the obtaining finish of a collision, probably from getting caused one particular, or at the very least observing a family members member seeking to deal with a single. It starts with the accident, the police, a tow truck, entire body shop repairs, opening — and with any luck , properly closing — assets injury statements. It may possibly require an injury, health practitioner visits and time dropped from function, and a individual harm assert that the insurance firms will — once more, with any luck , — take care of instantly and quite. (Isn’t that why we pay back for the insurance?) If not, an lawyer may possibly require to be retained in get to get a fair settlement. Truck accidents and truck accident lawsuits, however, are different in almost every single way from the car accident system that most persons have at minimum some familiarity with.
Is There Any Part of Truck Accident Lawsuits That Isn’t Various?
This may well be the easier problem to inquire, and the less complicated remedy is, “No, not actually.” A quick list of the groups in which truck incidents and truck incident lawsuits are unique from the normal motor auto accident and insurance policies claim would have to at the very least include things like:
How the motor vehicle operates.
The physics of a truck incident pre-influence, at effect, and post-effect.
The people concerned — or “parties” — in a truck accident.
The distinctions in the legislation for truck motorists and trucking organizations.
The distinctions in evidence for truck incident scenarios.
How truck accident insurance coverage and claims managing is unique.
Let us form people dissimilarities into a pair distinct groupings to consider them in much more detail.
How Truck Accidents Come about Otherwise from Other Collisions
Set basically, trucks are more substantial and a lot more elaborate to run than passenger automobiles. A entirely loaded tractor-trailer might weigh 20 moments as a lot as the regular passenger automobile. It’s various moments extended and taller than a passenger automobile and may possibly be nearly twice its width. It could have 1 or additional articulated towing joints that make turning — and primarily backing — a lot more challenging. A huge truck requires substantially lengthier to get up to velocity and a great deal lengthier in both of those time and length to slow or halt. Vehicles also often have much additional sophisticated operating units, from various manual driving gears and air brakes, to mirrors and cameras for observing other visitors, and specialized lights and reflectors for raising visibility to other men and women on the highway. Some vehicles that are reason-constructed for precise capabilities — cement trucks, garbage vans, vehicle haulers — will have further traits and functioning attributes that are even additional unique. There’s a superior rationale why federal and point out rules call for just about all drivers of big vehicles to have a special commercial driver’s license — there is a fantastic offer they ought to discover in buy to safely and securely function these automobiles. And all the methods in which a large truck (and functioning one) is diverse from everyday motor autos also explain one of a kind means in which truck incidents and truck accident lawsuits may well be really distinctive.
How The Folks Included in Truck Accidents Are Diverse
A collision amongst passenger cars and any individual injury statements that result from it usually will only contain two folks — just the drivers who ended up involved in the incident if they transpire to also be the owners of the automobiles. Or perhaps a few other people today may well be involved if the homeowners are someone else or if there had been travellers in the vehicles. Truck mishaps, nevertheless, will quickly involve many parties — at times with intricate small business, authorized, and insurance coverage interactions with one particular an additional.
We just explained how and why truck drivers are distinctive in the techniques needed to work a huge truck, but the people today included in a truck incident include several other individuals, as effectively. Driving that truck driver is the trucking corporation for whom they get the job done, and which very likely owns and maintains the truck or the individual tractor and trailer that were remaining pushed. Or a lot more than 1 firm if the trailer was owned by a diverse trucking carrier.
If the accident resulted in some degree from a mechanical defect in the truck, then it is critical to comprehend that many trucks — primarily kinds with specialized capabilities — may well have numerous organizations involved in manufacturing the truck and therefore lawfully liable for design and style or producing flaws.
In addition to the driver, owner, and brands who may possibly have been liable for the truck by itself, the normal trucking load will also include the people today and organizations dependable for arranging the shipment, loading, consignment, and brokerage facts for the job. All these different get-togethers will have varying lawful obligations to a single another and various possible involvement in the authorized and liability features that should be sorted out for any personal injuries claim and truck incident litigation.
How Truck Incident Statements and Truck Accident Litigation Are Taken care of In another way
Just about every of the people today and organizations included in this tangle — driver, trucking provider, truck manufacturers, shippers, brokers, cargo entrepreneurs — might have various insurance policy businesses and, inevitably, diverse authorized counsel representing them. An early and thorough investigation of the incident to figure out specifically how and why it occurred will commonly slim this concentration down significantly. That can make the investigation method (at times also involving incident reconstruction) a important early step in truck accident instances. This also will discover the insurance policies coverages that are out there and their likely adequacy compared to the seriousness of the injuries (or fatalities) that the truck accident may well have prompted.
Due to the actuality that main injuries that are far more probably to be caused by huge trucks than lesser motor vehicles, in mixture with the big insurance coverage insurance policies that trucking businesses are expected to carry, truck incident damage claims are much far more probable to transform into truck accident lawsuits and litigation than are statements from passenger automobile collisions. Skilled personalized personal injury lawyers will understand this fact, and will be organized with the abilities and assets necessary to effectively litigate truck incident damage lawsuits.
Check out this news report online video showing how the extra vulnerability that vehicles have to adverse climate problems — in this scenario icy roadway surfaces — can result in accidents with devastating implications:
Truck Accident Attorneys in California
Hi, my identify is Ed Smith, and I’m a California truck accident legal professional. Private damage law companies who have encounter with truck incident litigation and injury claims are familiar with the many, lots of strategies in which truck accidents are diverse from normal motor vehicle mishaps. Owning the understanding, skills, and methods to kind by way of these discrepancies and complexities is the most essential provider a truck incident legal professional can deliver for purchasers. If you or a relatives member has endured a really serious harm because of to negligence of a truck driver, be sure to make contact with us these days at (916) 921-6400 or toll-absolutely free at (800) 404-5400 for cost-free, welcoming assistance. You can also reach us by means of our on line make contact with form.
In past posts, I criticized equally the Biden administration’s authorized rationale for the president’s enormous scholar personal loan personal debt cancellation policy and a achievable substitute justification for it. But quite a few industry experts think these challenges will never ever get their day in court, due to the fact no a person will have standing to file a lawsuit hard debt cancellation. Most likely the administration sees this procedural problem as their ace in the hole: it does not make any difference if the lawful justification for your system is weak if no one particular can get into courtroom to obstacle it!
The dilemma of standing is a legitimate problem for opponents of the credit card debt cancellation coverage. But it need not be an insuperable a single. There are at minimum a few kinds of litigants who can plausibly get standing: 1 or equally homes of Congress, student mortgage servicers, and faculties that do not accept federally backed student financial loans, but contend with all those that do.
Less than recent Supreme Courtroom precedent, plaintiffs have to meet up with a few prerequisites to get standing to file a lawsuit in federal court: They ought to 1) have experienced an “damage in simple fact,” 2) the injuries in query have to be brought on by the allegedly illegal conduct they are complicated, and 3) a courtroom decision really should be capable to redress the injuries.
In my see, the whole doctrine of standing is not a authentic constitutional need, and the Supreme Court docket should abolish it. But that’s remarkably not likely to come about. So, for current applications, I will presume the validity of present precedent. Whether or not it can be proper or not, litigants will have to operate in just it.
The primary opportunity stumbling block in this circumstance is the requirement of “harm in truth.” It could be difficult to verify that scholar personal loan cancellation injures any one, in the feeling essential by Supreme Court docket precedent. Cancelling some of A’s scholar mortgage credit card debt will not automatically injure B and C. The some others may possibly imagine it is unfair they experienced to spend off all their loans themselves, when A won’t. But, with rare exceptions, recent precedent demands some type of tangible injuries. Unfairness, by by itself, is just not enough.
It may perhaps be that taxpayers endure a tangible personal injury, simply because bank loan forgiveness denies cash to the federal treasury, thus forcing them to bear extra of the stress of community expenditures. Any unlawful expenditure of community funds necessarily diverts taxpayer sources absent from duly authorized applications. But the Supreme Court docket has lengthy denied these kinds of taxpayer standing, in all but a several unconventional conditions, which are not relevant here.
I consider taxpayers should really have wide standing to challenge any unconstitutional expenditure of public money. But this is one more issue on which the Supreme Courtroom is unlikely to go my way, at any time soon.
But even though taxpayers normally do not have standing to challenge unlawful takes advantage of of general public money by the government, the Senate and the Property of Reps do! The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit so held in a 2020 case in which the Democratic-controlled Residence of Associates submitted a lawsuit demanding Donald Trump’s endeavor to divert armed forces funds to develop his border wall (a situation which has lots of parallels to the existing scenario). The choice was published by notable conservative Decide David Sentelle, who reasoned as follows:
[T]he Household is suing to cure an institutional damage to its have institutional electric power to avoid the expenditure of money not licensed. Taking the allegations of the grievance as correct and assuming at this phase that the Dwelling is accurate on the merits of its legal position, the Residence is independently and distinctly hurt mainly because the Government Branch has allegedly slice the House out of its constitutionally indispensable legislative function. Extra specifically, by paying out resources that the House refused to enable, the Executive Department has defied an convey constitutional prohibition that safeguards every congressional chamber’s unilateral authority to avoid expenditures….
To put it merely, the Appropriations Clause [of Article I of the Constitution] necessitates two keys to unlock the Treasury, and the Dwelling retains a person of those people keys. The Govt Branch has, in a word, snatched the House’s essential out of its palms. That is the harm about which the Household is suing…
To keep that the Residence is not hurt or that courts can’t recognize that injury would rewrite the Appropriations Clause. That Clause has prolonged been comprehended to test the energy of the Govt Department by allowing it to expend cash only as exclusively authorized…
Sentelle’s reasoning is persuasive, and pretty of course applies to Biden’s bank loan forgiveness plan, no considerably less than Trump’s border wall diversion. Below this approach, either the Household or the Senate would have standing to sue, even if the other house chose not to.
Of class neither dwelling is very likely to sue so very long as Democrats management both of them. But that could improve soon after the November election, when Republicans could probably retake one or equally of them (the Property considerably extra probable than the Senate). If so, they could depend on the border wall precedent to get the standing they want for a lawsuit.
However, the Property or Senate would possible have to file as an establishment in get to get standing. The Supreme Court docket has ruled that personal customers of Congress deficiency standing to sue the executive around fiscal challenges.
A next kind of entity that could get standing to sue is scholar bank loan servicers. These corporations accumulate pupil bank loan payments on behalf of the government, and the dimension of the costs they get relies upon in element on how much revenue is owed, whether the financial loan is delinquent, and how extensive the borrower will take to repay it. If mortgage forgiveness lessens delinquency rates, enables some debtors to repay more quickly, or in any other case affects the amount servicing companies get compensated, they fairly certainly undergo an damage in actuality, and would have standing to sue. Fordham legislation Prof. Jed Shugerman has achieved substantially the same conclusion.
It truly is attainable mortgage servicers will be scared to sue, mainly because they will not want to antagonize the federal Department of Schooling. A good partnership with the feds may be important to ensure their continued profitability. But if any are willing to sue, standing should not be considerably of a problem. And a single plaintiff is more than enough to get the issue to courtroom. Even if most bank loan servicers prefer to remain out of it, 1 may perhaps be willing to consider the threat. Alternatively, they could band with each other and sue jointly, therefore producing it more challenging for the Department of Education and learning to retaliate versus them (given that the Department may perhaps be reluctant to slice them all off).
A closing category of plaintiffs who could get standing is schools that refuse federal funding (which includes federal pupil financial loans), but compete with these who acknowledge it. These generally conservative-leaning institutions reject federal resources mainly because they do not want to be subject matter to the regulations that come with them. Illustrations contain Grove City College, and Hillsdale College or university. For evident factors, personal loan cancellation tends to make schools that settle for federal scholar financial loans extra competitive relative to all those that do not. The latter grow to be rather more cost-effective possibilities for learners.
Courts have lengthy acknowledged “competitor standing” to sue to obstacle guidelines that reinforce the competitive sector place of the plaintiff’s rivals. Possibly the competitive injuries below is little. Perhaps only a few college students are likely to forego attending Grove Metropolis School or Hillsdale as a result of Biden’s steps. But even a compact money reduction, such as nominal damages, is adequate to qualify as an “harm in actuality” less than standing doctrine.
These three options aren’t automatically exhaustive. They are just the types that most conveniently happen to me, and I confess I am far from being an expert on college student loans. There may be other forms of litigants who can also get standing to challenge Biden’s scholar credit card debt cancellation prepare. But these examples do counsel that standing have to have not be a display-stopper in this article. Much more probable than not, courts will ultimately have to rule on the legal deserves of the policy.
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/V2DNHI7NDVOJXPLZVJAW2PDAGE.jpg?w=2000&resize=2000,1200&ssl=1 "Baylor Medicine gets rare win in Covid coverage case against Lloyd’s")
