Meta, law firm Gibson Dunn sanctioned in Facebook privacy case

By Andrew Goudsward

(Reuters) – A U.S. judge on Thursday sanctioned Meta Platforms Inc and its law organization, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher for “delay, misdirection and frivolous arguments” in a data privacy lawsuit above the company’s sharing of consumer data with 3rd-get-togethers.

U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria in San Francisco purchased Meta, Facebook’s father or mother firm, and Gibson Dunn to fork out about $925,000 about what he explained was an energy to make the litigation unnecessarily difficult and highly-priced for the plaintiffs.

Chhabria, who has lengthy been vital of Gibson Dunn’s managing of the case, said the firm and Facebook mounted a “sustained, concerted, bad-religion effort to throw obstacle following impediment in front of the plaintiffs—all in an try to force the plaintiffs into settling the case for less than they would have gotten normally.”

Reps for Gibson Dunn and Fb did not straight away reply to requests for remark. The organization has argued in court filings that it followed courtroom orders and has blamed the plaintiffs for issuing “unreasonable and incessant” requires for organization documents. Los Angeles-launched Gibson Dunn has represented the firm in various issues.

FILE PHOTO: The logo of Meta Platforms' business group is seen in Brussels

FILE Photo: The brand of Meta Platforms’ business enterprise team is found in Brussels

Meta, Facebook’s father or mother enterprise, agreed final calendar year to fork out $725 million to settle the lawsuit, which was sparked by revelations in 2018 that Facebook had permitted British political consulting company Cambridge Analytica to entry facts of as quite a few as 87 million users. The business did not acknowledge wrongdoing.

In Thursday’s selection, the choose faulted Meta and its lawyers for proclaiming they had been only essential to make interior files in the circumstance about consumer data the company admitted it shared with 3rd-parties. The court docket experienced requested Facebook to switch about knowledge it experienced gathered on the plaintiffs in the case, no matter of irrespective of whether it had been shared.

The judge also accused Meta’s legal team of needlessly delaying turning over files related to an inside investigation Facebook experienced commissioned into 3rd-bash apps that accessed user facts.

The situation is IN RE: Fb, INC. Buyer Privacy Person Profile Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 18-md-02843-VC.

For plaintiffs: Derek Loeser of Keller Rohrback and Lesley Weaver of Bleichmar Fonti

For Meta: Rosemarie Ring of Gibson Dunn

(Reporting by Andrew Goudsward)

Related Posts

The Legal Options for Victims of Defective Vape Pens

Vaping is becoming more popular and the number of defective vape pens has increased. This has resulted in serious injuries and health risks. Vape pens that contain toxic chemicals or…

Seeking Justice: Why Hiring a Wrongful Death Lawyer Is Essential

Losing a loved one is always difficult, but it can be devastating when another person’s negligence or wrongdoing causes death. While no amount of money can replace a family member,…

Property Law

Unlawful Entry Lawyer: Protecting Your Rights and Property

Unlawful Entry Lawyer: Protecting Your Rights and Property

Do litigators only handle civil law cases?

Do litigators only handle civil law cases?

Understanding Estate Planning – How an Estate Lawyer Can Help

Understanding Estate Planning – How an Estate Lawyer Can Help

Consequences of Not Paying Timeshare Maintenance Fees

Consequences of Not Paying Timeshare Maintenance Fees

The Impact of Australian Property Laws on Property Investment Strategies

The Impact of Australian Property Laws on Property Investment Strategies

A Seller’s Guide to Navigating Intellectual Property Law on Amazon | Dickinson Wright

A Seller’s Guide to Navigating Intellectual Property Law on Amazon | Dickinson Wright